I need to prove the commutation relation,
[p2,f]=2ℏi∂f∂xp−ℏ2∂2f∂x2
where f≡f(→r) and →p=px→i
I know
[AB,C]=A[B,C]+[A,C]B
Applying this, I get
[p2,f]=p[p,f]+[p,f]p
where p=ℏi∂∂x, and [p,f]≡pf−fp
using a trial function, g(x), I get
[p2,f]=p[p,f]g+[p,f]pg
=ℏi∂∂x[ℏi∂fg∂x−fℏi∂g∂x]+[ℏi∂fg∂x−fℏi∂g∂x]ℏi∂∂x
using the product rule
=−ℏ2∂∂x[g∂f∂x+f∂g∂x−f∂g∂x]+[g∂f∂x+f∂g∂x−f∂g∂x]ℏi2∂∂x
cancelling the like terms in the brackets gives
=−ℏ2∂∂x[g∂f∂x]−[g∂f∂x]ℏ2∂∂x
using the product rule again gives
=−ℏ2[∂g∂x∂f∂x+g∂2f∂x2]−[g∂f∂x]ℏ2∂∂x
∂g∂x=0, so
=−ℏ2g∂2∂x2−ℏ2g∂f∂x∂∂x
Substituting the momentum operator back in gives
=−ℏ2g∂2∂x2−ℏig∂f∂xp
The trial function, g, can now be dropped,
=−ℏ2∂2∂x2−ℏi∂f∂xp
But this is not what I was supposed to arrive at. Where did I go wrong?
Answer
I didn't read your answer, but let's think about just computing the operator ∂2xf. First we need to compute the operator ∂xf. Now I am saying "the operator" because we are viewing ∂xf as a composition of first multiplying by f and then taking the derivative. By the product rule, we know ∂xf=(∂xf)+f∂x, were by (∂xf), I really do just mean multiplication by the derivative of f.
Now lets try to compute ∂2xf. It is ∂x[(∂xf)+f∂x]=(∂2xf)+(∂xf)∂x+(∂xf)∂x+f∂2x=(∂2xf)+2(∂xf)∂x+f∂2x.
Then [∂2x,f]=∂2xf−f∂2x=(∂2xf)+2(∂xf)∂x. If you understand this then you should get the right answer. You just need to put in the appropriate i's and ℏ's.
No comments:
Post a Comment