Sunday, January 6, 2019

general relativity - How can the Schwarzschild radius of the universe be 13.7 billion light years?


So i was reading about Schwarzschild radius on Wiki and I found a interesting thing written there link.




  • It says that the S. radius of the universe is as big as the size of the universe?





  • How is this possible?




  • Since most the universe is empty space shouldn't the S. radius of our universe be significantly smaller then 13.7 light years?





Answer



Firstly we should note that the universe as a whole is not described by the Schwarzschild metric, so the Schwarzschild radius of the universe is a meaningless concept. However if you take the mass of the observable universe you could ask what the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole of this mass is.


For a mass $M$ the Schwarzschild radius is:


$$ r_s = \frac{2GM}{c^2} \tag{1} $$



If the radius of the observable universe is $R$, and the density is $\rho$, then the mass is:


$$ M = \tfrac{4}{3}\pi R^3 \rho $$


and we can substitute in equation (1) to get:


$$ r_s = \frac{8G}{3c^2} \pi R^3 \rho \tag{2} $$


Now we believe that the density of the universe is the critical density, and from the FLRW metric with some hair pulling we can obtain a value for the critical density:


$$ \rho_c = \frac{3H^2}{8\pi G} $$


And we can substitute for $\rho$ in equation (2) to get:


$$ r_s = \frac{H^2}{c^2} R^3 \tag{3} $$


Now, Hubble's law tells that the velocity of a distant object is related to its distance $r$ by:


$$ v \approx Hr $$



and since the edge of the universe, $r_e$, is where the recession velocity is $c$ we get:


$$ r_e \approx \frac{c}{H} $$


and substituting this in equation (3) gives;


$$ r_s = \frac{1}{r_e^2} R^3 \tag{4} $$


If $r_e = R$ then we'd be left with $r_s = R$ and we'd have shown that the Schwarzschild radius of the mass of the observable universe is equal to it's radius. Sadly it doesn't quite work. The dimension $R$ is the current size of the observable universe, which is around 46.6 billion light years, while the size used in Hubble's law, $r_e$, is the current apparent size 13.7 billion light years.


If I take equation (3) and put in $R$ = 46.6 billion light years and $H$ = 68 km/sec/megaParsec I get $r_s$ to be around 500 billion light years or a lot larger than the size of the observable universe.


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...