a point of mass m moves on the xy−Plane and has the potential energy U(x,y)=A2(x2+y2)+B with A,B>0 being two constants.
Let →r denote the position of the mass on the xy−Plane.
We knoe that m¨→r=−∇U(x,y)
We first write U(r,φ)=A2r2+B
so we get ∇U(r,φ)=(Ar0)
We now calculate ¨→r in polar coordinates.
We have
→r=r(cos(φ)sin(φ))
˙→r=˙r(cos(φ)sin(φ))+r(−sin(φ)cos(φ))˙φ
¨→r=¨r(cos(φ)sin(φ))+2˙r(−sin(φ)cos(φ))˙φ−r(cos(φ)sin(φ))˙φ2+r(−sin(φ)cos(φ))¨φ
we put everything together:
¨→r=¨r(cos(φ)sin(φ))+2˙r(−sin(φ)cos(φ))˙φ−r(cos(φ)sin(φ))˙φ2+r(−sin(φ)cos(φ))¨φ=−1m(Ar0)
(*)Since (cos(φ)sin(φ))=ˆer and (−sin(φ)cos(φ))=ˆeφ and also (Ar0)=Arˆer+0⋅ˆeφ we get:
(**)(¨→r−r˙φ22˙r˙φ+r¨φ)=−1m(Ar0)
My lecture notes now write it down like this:
(***)(¨→rr¨φ)=(−Arm+r˙φ2−2˙r˙φ)
Question 1: Is (−sin(φ)cos(φ))=ˆeφ true or is it rather (−sin(φ)cos(φ))=−ˆeφ?
Question 2: Is there a reason why we wrote ( ** ) as ( * ** )? Does the left side of (***) tell us something?
Question 3: Is it possible that my potential depends on r and φ? And if so, could I write down the general formula like that:
(m¨→rmr¨φ)=(Kr(r,φ)+r˙φ2Kφ(r,φ)−2m˙r˙φ)
With K(r,φ) being a conservative force field (so K=−∇U applies)
Question 4: Why don't I have to transform the constants?
Answer
Question 1:
It's up to you to chose a basis to your problem. They can differ only by a global fase (such a minus sign, since eiπ=−1).
Question 2:
As you might see, both expressions are the same. It's up to you chose the one you prefer. However, when you get something equals to a constant is always a good thing, since means that a quantity is conserved (in your case, \frac{d}{dt}2\dot{r}\dot{φ}+r\ddot{φ})
Question 3:
you can get (at least, theoretically) a potential V=V(r,\varphi) and there will be a general formula (take into account that \nabla U=\frac{\partial U}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial U}{\partial \varphi})
No comments:
Post a Comment