I know that one can mathematically derive and prove that in a damped oscillator (without external driving) the time period of oscillations is a constant. But how can one physically interpret as to why should the time period of oscillations be constant even though there is a resistive medium and decreasing amplitude, meaning the amplitude of oscillations decrease exactly with growing time so as to give a constant time period. How can one explain this absolute miracle physically without the help of equations?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?
I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...
-
Are C1, C2 and C3 connected in parallel, or C2, C3 in parallel and C1 in series with C23? Btw it appeared as a question in the basic physics...
-
I was solving the sample problems for my school's IQ society and there are some I don't get. Since all I get is a final score, I wan...
-
I have read the radiation chapter, where I have been introduced with the terms emissivity and absorptivity. emissivity tells about the abili...
No comments:
Post a Comment