I am looking at circular orbits in the Schwarzschild metric and the energy associated with them. In places I look the energy is given as: $$ \newcommand{\p}[2]{\frac{\partial #1}{\partial #2}} \newcommand{\f}[2]{\frac{ #1}{ #2}} \newcommand{\l}[0]{\left(} \newcommand{\r}[0]{\right)} \newcommand{\mean}[1]{\langle #1 \rangle}\newcommand{\e}[0]{\varepsilon} \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left|#1\right>} E=\l 1-\f{r_s}{r}\r\f{dt}{d\tau}=\f{r-2GM}{r(1-3GM)}$$ examples of where this is done is Moore, 2013 pg 126 and Baumgarte & Shapiro, 2010 pg10. But is the energy not simply given by the zeroth component of the 4-momentum i.e.: $$ E=\f{dt}{d\tau}=\f{r-2GM}{r(1-3GM)(1-\f{r_s}{r})}$$ where deos the extra factor of $1-\f{r_s}{r}$ come from and which is the correct expression?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?
I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...
-
Consider a compound pendulum pivoted about a fixed horizontal axis, illustrated by the force diagram on the right: # Okay, I can't figur...
-
In the crystal, infinitesimal translational symmetry breaking makes the phonon, In ferromagnet, time-reversal symmetry breaking makes magnon...
-
I was solving the sample problems for my school's IQ society and there are some I don't get. Since all I get is a final score, I wan...
No comments:
Post a Comment