When finding out the order of magnitude of quantities, as said in my textbook, we compare the numerical part with 3.2 (approximately √10 or rounded off version of 3.162)
Thus, 9.12×105 has an order of magnitude of 6 since 9.12 is >= 3.2
But what if we had 3.17×105. According to my textbook, its order of magnitude would be 5, as 3.17 is less than 3.2. But, as we have to compare with √10, which is 3.162, the order of magnitude should be 6, as 3.17 is greater than 3.162. This is my question.
Or to rephrase, when we are rounding off √10 to 3.2, why aren't we rounding off the numerical part 3.17 ?
I hope I made myself clear. I have looked at this, this, and this, but that doesn't satisfy me.
Answer
I think you are attaching excessive significance to your order of magnitude estimate. If I say something is 105 to within an order of magnitude I mean that the log10 of that quantity is nearer 5 than 4 or 6. If some quantity has a log10 of about 5.5 does it really matter whether our order of magnitude estimate is 105 or 106?
Incidentally, if you wondered why we use √10 as the dividing line it's because log10(√10)=0.5. So for example the log10 of something slightly less than √(10) is nearer 0 than 1, while the log10 of something slightly greater than √(10) is nearer 1 than 0.
No comments:
Post a Comment