Saturday, November 14, 2015

soft question - Order of magnitude


When finding out the order of magnitude of quantities, as said in my textbook, we compare the numerical part with 3.2 (approximately 10 or rounded off version of 3.162)


Thus, 9.12×105 has an order of magnitude of 6 since 9.12 is >= 3.2


But what if we had 3.17×105. According to my textbook, its order of magnitude would be 5, as 3.17 is less than 3.2. But, as we have to compare with 10, which is 3.162, the order of magnitude should be 6, as 3.17 is greater than 3.162. This is my question.



Or to rephrase, when we are rounding off 10 to 3.2, why aren't we rounding off the numerical part 3.17 ?


I hope I made myself clear. I have looked at this, this, and this, but that doesn't satisfy me.



Answer



I think you are attaching excessive significance to your order of magnitude estimate. If I say something is 105 to within an order of magnitude I mean that the log10 of that quantity is nearer 5 than 4 or 6. If some quantity has a log10 of about 5.5 does it really matter whether our order of magnitude estimate is 105 or 106?


Incidentally, if you wondered why we use 10 as the dividing line it's because log10(10)=0.5. So for example the log10 of something slightly less than (10) is nearer 0 than 1, while the log10 of something slightly greater than (10) is nearer 1 than 0.


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...