Monday, March 20, 2017

quantum mechanics - How to construct the radial component of the momentum operator?


I'm having trouble doing it. I know so far that if we have two Hermitian operators A and B that do not commute, and suppose we wish to find the quantum mechanical Hermitian operator for the product AB, then


AB+BA2.


However, if I have to find an operator equivalent for the radial component of momentum, I am puzzled. It does not come out to be simply


prr+rrp2,


where r and p are the position and the momentum operator, respectively. Where am I wrong in understanding this?



Answer



You would have to use the fact that the momentum operator in position space is p=i and use the definition of the gradient operator in spherical coordinates:


=ˆrr+ˆθ1rθ+ˆϕ1rsinθϕ


So the radial component of momentum is



pr=iˆrr


However: after a bit of investigation prompted by the comments, I found that in practice this is not used very much. It's more useful to have an operator pr that satisfies


22m2R(r)=p2r2mR(r)


This lets you write the radial component of the time-independent Schrödinger equation as


(p2r2m+V(r))R(r)=ER(r)


The action of the radial component of the Laplacian in 3D is


2R(r)=1r2r(r2R(r)r)


and if you solve for the operator pr that satisfies the definition above, you wind up with


pr=i(r+1r)


This is called the "radial momentum operator." Strictly speaking, it is different from the "radial component of the momentum operator," which is, by definition, pr as I wrote it above, although I wouldn't be surprised to find people mixing up the terminology relatively often.



No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...