Thursday, March 14, 2019

newtonian mechanics - Angular momentum with respect to the centre of mass


I have been told [Warning: I leave this because it's what I asked and allows to understand the dialogues in the comments, but Azad, whom I thank, has pointed that the formula does not hold in general in the form it is expressed] that the angular momentum of and rigid body with respect to any point P can always be expressed as LP=rcm×Mvcm+(imiR2i)ω where rcm is the position of the centre of mass with respect to P, M the mass of the body, Ri the distance of the i-th point, having mass mi, composing the body, and imiR2i=I its moment of inertia with respect to the instantaneous axis of the rotation around the centre of mass of angular velocity ω.



I know that the velocity vi of each point Pi, having mass mi, of a rigid body of mass M can be see as the sum of a translation velocity of one of its points C plus a rotation velocity around that point: vi=vC+ω×CPi. If we chose C as the centre of mass I see that Lcm=iCPi×mivi=iCPi×mivcm+iCPi×mi(ω×CPi)=iCPi×mi(ω×CPi)because, if I am not wrong, iCPi×mivC=(imiCPi)×vC=0 since imiCPi is the position of the centre of mass with respect to itself, which is 0.


How can it be proved that iCPi×mi(ω×CPi)=(imiR2i)ω? I have searched a lot on the Internet and on books, but I find nothing. To give some background of mine, I have studied nothing of analytical mechanics. I find the formula very, very interesting both in itself and because, if the moment of inertia does not depend upon time, tI(t)=I(t0), the above expression can be differentiated to get the formula of the resultant torque with respect to the centre of mass τcm=dLcmdt=Iαcm where α is the angular acceleration around the centre of mass. I heartily thank you for any answer!




Some unfruitful trials: by using the "BAC CAB identity" as suggested by Azad, whom I heartily thank, a×(b×c)=(ac)b(ab)c, I can see thatiCPi×mi(ω×CPi)=imiCPi2ωmi(CPiω)CPiwhich, by decomposing every CPi into an axial component Ai and a radial component Ri, whose norms respectively are Ai and Ri, with Ri as the distance from i to the axis of rotation, becomes imiR2iω+imiA2iωmi(Aiω)CPibut I cannot prove that imiA2iωmi(Aiω)CPi=0.



Answer



I think you are overcomplicating this. Consider an arbitrary point P moving with linear speed vA.



  • Linear momentum is P=mvcm

  • Angular momentum at the center of mass is Lcm=Icmω

  • Linear velocity of the center of mass is vcm=vA+ω×rcm where rcm is the location of the center of mass relative to A.


  • Linear momentum in terms of the motion of A is P=m(vA+ω×rcm) P=mvAmrcm×ω

  • Angular momentum at A is LA=Lcm+rcm×P which is expanded as LA=Icmω+rcm×mvcm=Icmω+rcm×m(vA+ω×rcm)


LA=Icmωmrcm×rcm×ω+mvA



  • Combined the spatial momenum at A yields the 6×6 spatial inertia matrix at A


ˆA=IAˆvA {PLA}=[mm[rcm×]m[rcm×]Icmm[rcm×][rcm×]]{vAω}


NOTE: For the wierd [r×] notation that seems to be missing a vector see What is the Vector/Cross Product?




  • The mass momenent of inertia at A is thus defined as IA=Icmm[rcm×][rcm×] This is an vector representation of the parallel axis theorem.

  • Finally you need to differentiate the momentum expressions to arrive at the 6 Newton-Euler equations of motion (See https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/80449/392)


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...