Monday, September 23, 2019

quantum mechanics - Tensor Product of Hilbert spaces


This question is regarding a definition of Tensor product of Hilbert spaces that I found in Wald's book on QFT in curved space time. Let's first get some notation straight.


Let (V,+,) denote a set V, together with + and being the addition and multiplication maps on V that satisfy the vector space axioms. We define the complex conjugate multiplication ¯:C×VV as c¯Ψ=¯cΨ,    ΨV

The vector space formed by (V,+,¯) is called the complex conjugate vector space and is denoted by ¯V.


Given two Hilbert spaces H1 and H2 and a bounded linear map A:H1H2, we define the adjoint of this map A:H2H1 as Ψ2,AΨ1H2=AΨ2,Ψ1H1

where  , H1 is the inner product as defined on H1 (similarly for H2) and Ψ1H1, Ψ2H2. That such map always exists can be proved using the Riesz lemma.


Here the word "bounded" simply means that there exists some CR such that A(Ψ1)H2CΨ1H1

for all Ψ1H1 and where   H1 is the norm as defined on H1 (similarly for H2)


Great! Now for the statement. Here it is.



The tensor product, H1H2, of two Hilbert spaces, H1 and H2, may be defined as follows. Let V denote the set of linear maps A:¯H1H2, which have finite rank, i.e. such that the range of A is a finite dimensional subspace of H2. The V has a natural vector space structure. Define the inner product on V by A,BV=tr(AB)

(The right side of the above equation is well defined, since AB:¯H1¯H1 has a finite rank). We define H1H2 to be the Hilbert space completion of V. It follows that H1H2 consists of all linear maps A:¯H1H2 that satisfy the Hilbert-Schmidt condition tr(AA)<.




My question is


1. How does this definition of the Tensor product of Hilbert spaces match up with the one we are familiar with when dealing with tensors in General relativity?


PS - I also have a similar problem with Wald's definition of a Direct Sum of Hilbert spaces. I have decided to put that into a separate question. If you could answer this one, please consider checking out that one too. It can be found here. Thanks!



Answer



I don't think Wald ever defines a tensor product for infinite dimensional space in his GR text, so I presume your question is about the finite dimensional case where we simply write the tensor product as the vector space over pairs uivj where u and v are a basis. I will show the equivalence in that case.


If we have two finite dimensional Hilbert spaces H1, H2 we can take the orthonormal bases uiH1 , vjH2. Since everything is finite dimensional, everything is finite rank, so the the vector space is just the the space of linear maps from H1 to H2. Take a linear map A and define aij=A(ui),vj=ui,A(vj). Using the orthonormality of the bases that means aij is simply the matrix presentation of A, and the vector space is simply the appropriate vector space of matrices. Then we can interpret Tr(AB) as the usual matrix trace which gives ijaijbij.


This is equivalent to the usual notation whereby we write tensor products as elements ijaijuivj. Again the vector space is the appropriately sized matrices. The inner product is defined to be ab,cd=a,bc,d. This gives the same result as above after plugging in the basis.


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...