I was reading CH3 of Reichl's "A Modern Course in Statistical Physics" on Ginzburg-Landau theory and don't really understand a couple of points he makes. He writes:
I don't understand why the first order term in η would imply a nonzero value of the order parameter above the transition point, and I don't really get the motivation for the −fη term either. If you had the η α1(Y,T) term then ∂ϕ∂η=α1+ηα2+...−f=0 then putting η=0 doesn't work so I guess that kind of makes sense, but then you have this −f which would seem to mess things up anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment