Sunday, June 21, 2015

Why should field operators satisfy the classical equations of motion?


To quantize a scalar field theory with the action:


S=dDxL(ϕ,μϕ)=dx0L(ϕ,0ϕ)


we promote ϕ(x) and π=δLδ(0ϕ)=π(x) to be field operator at fixed time x0 (with the canonical commutation relation [ϕ(x),π(y)]=δD1(xy)), then we use the classical equation of motion to find ϕ and π at all time.


What principles lie behind this? Why can we assume that the field operators satisfy the classical equation of motion?




By example if we have a classical theory with S=dtL(ϕ,tϕ), momentum π=δLδ(tϕ) hamiltonian H=πϕL, the classical equation of motion is:


dϕdt=δLδ(tϕ)


When we do the canonical quantization, we promote [ϕ,π]=δ(xy) and the equation of motion for ϕ is dϕdt=i[H,ϕ]



Why should i[H,ϕ] has the same form as δLδ(tϕ)? This fact comes from where?



Answer



How to see it in canonical quantization: All operators O in a quantum theory fulfill the Heisenberg equations of motion ddtO(t)=i[H,O(t)]

where H is the Hamiltonian density and which is exactly the quantum version of the classical Hamiltonian equations of motion. So the fields, as they are operators, indeed must obey the classical equations of motion.


How to see it in path integral quantization: Write ϕ(x)=ϕ(x)+ϵδ(yx) and observe the path integral measure is invariant under this. Expand the integrand to first order in ϵ, and deduce (δSδϕ(x)+J(x))eiS[ϕ]+JϕDϕ=0

which is known as the Schwinger-Dyson equation. Setting J=0 gives δS/δϕ=0 (inside the path integral, which is the PI version of "as an operator equation"), which is exactly the classical equation of motion.


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...