Wednesday, August 19, 2015

quantum mechanics - Are Born-Oppenheimer energies analytic functions of nuclear positions?


I am looking for references to bibliography that explores the smoothness and analyticity of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions (and matrix elements in general) of a hamiltonian that depends on some parameter.


Consider, for example, the original setting of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, to molecular dynamics, where the nuclear wavefunction is momentarily ignored and the hamiltonian becomes parametrized by the positions Rm of the nuclei, ˆH(Rm)=Ni=122m2i+i>je2|rirj|i,mZme2|riRm|. The energies En(Rm) then become functions of all the nuclear coordinates and therefore make up the energy landscape which governs the nuclear wavefunctions' evolution. Since the original appearance of the Rm is in the analytic (well, meromorphic) functions 1|riRm|, I would expect further dependence on the Rm to be meromorphic (and would definitely expect physical meaning from poles and branch cuts).


What I am looking for is references to bibliography that will establish or disprove results of this type in as general a setting as possible. In particular, given a hamiltonian that depends on a set of parameters z1,,zm in a suitably defined analytic way, I would like to see results establishing the analyticity of matrix elements (and thus, for example, of eigenvalues) involving the eigenvectors of the hamiltonian. I would also be interested in knowing what quantities can be extended analytically to the complex plane.


Any and all pointers will be deeply appreciated.



Answer



Suppose that for all z in some open set Z of complex numbers containing z0, the Hamiltonian H(z) is a compact perturbation of the self-adjoint H(z0) depending analytically on z. Then, for every simple eigenvalue E0 of H(z0) and associated normalized eigenstate ψ0, there exist a complex neighborhood N of z0 and unique functions E(z) and ψ(z), defined and analytic on N, such that E(z0)=E0, ψ(z0)=ψ0, and H(z)ψ(z)=E(z)ψ(z) and ψ0ψ(z)=1 for all zN.


The proof is essentially the inverse function theorem in a Banach space for the resulting nonlinear system, combined with the spectral theorem applied to H(z0). I guess you can find the relevant background results (if not a perturbation statement similar to the above) in the old book by Kato.



No assumption is needed that H(z) is self-adjoint (would not be the case for all zZ unless H(z) is constant). Of course the eigenvalues will generally move into the complex domain if z0 was real but z is complex.


Weakening the assumptions will require stronger (so-called ''hard'') forms of the inverse function theorem, which generally take a lot of technicality to state and verify.


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...