Sunday, August 16, 2015

quantum mechanics - Quasiclassical QM for central fields


Let's have quasiclassical QM for central field V(r). The Schroedinger equation for radial part of wavefunction Rn after substitution un=rRn takes the form
un+k2nunl=0,k2n=2m(EnV(r)(+1)2mr2).

I don't understand the reasoning for the Langer correction


(+1)(+12)2.


The most of authors usually claim that it is important because we need that the phase of our function on infinity must coincide with phase of exact solution.


What phase is discussed in this statement? In terms of previous question, how to show that this replacement leads to correct phase?


References:



  1. L.D. Landau & E.M. Lifshitz, QM, Vol. 3, 3rd ed, 1981; §49.




Answer



I) Let us for simplicity put the physical constants =1=m to one. OP is considering the usual transcription u(r)rR(r) of the 3D radial TISE into a 1D TISE,


12u(r)+U(r)u(r) = Eu(r),


where the total potential energy


U(r) := U(r)+C2r2


is a sum of a central potential energy U(r) and a centrifugal potential energy C2r2. Here and below the equation numbers refer to Ref. 1. The constant


C := (+1) = (+12)214


in eq. (49.8b) is the eigenvalue of the ˆL2 operator.


II) We are investigating a bound state where the angular momentum >0 is non-zero.



We are interested in the situation where the centrifugal potential energy numerically completely dominates [and the potential U(r) can be ignored] in a neighborhood [0,r0+ϵ[ of the classically forbidden interval [0,r0[, where r0 denotes the inner radial turning point. In other words,


E  C2r20.


We also want the semiclassical WKB approximation to be valid in the interval [0,r0[ (away from the turning point). The semiclassical condition


|λ(r)|  1

implies that


  1.


III) The (absolute value of the) momentum is


p(r) := 2|EU(r)|  C|r2r20|forr[0,r0+ϵ[,


where


C (B)= +1218+O(2).


The semiclassical connection formulas yield



u(r)  cp(r)exp[r0rdr p(r)]forr < r0,


u(r)  cp(r)cos[rr0dr p(r)π4]

 = cp(r)sin[rr0dr p(r)+π4]forr > r0,


where cC.


IV) The semiclassical approximation (F) behaves as


u(r)  rC+12forr  0+,


while the well-known exact behavior is


u(r)  r+1forr  0+.


Hence, the semiclassical approximation would have the correct behavior at the origin r=0 if we replace (E) with +12.


V) Alternatively, in the free case U(r)=0, the semiclassical approximation (48.1) behaves as1


u(r)  sin[C(rr0π2)+π4]forr  ,



while the well-known exact behavior is


u(r)  sin[Crr0π2]forr  .


This again suggests to replace (E) with +12.


References:



  1. L.D. Landau & E.M. Lifshitz, QM, Vol. 3, 3rd ed, 1981; §49.




1 Momentum integral becomes


1Crr0dr p(r) = rr01dxxx21 = [x21+arctan1x21]x=rr0x=1

  rr0π2forr  .



No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...