Let's have quasiclassical QM for central field V(r). The Schroedinger equation for radial part of wavefunction Rnℓ after substitution unℓ=rRnℓ takes the form
unℓ″+k2nℓunl=0,k2nℓ=2m(Enℓ−V(r)−ℓ(ℓ+1)2mr2).
ℓ(ℓ+1)→(ℓ+12)2.
The most of authors usually claim that it is important because we need that the phase of our function on infinity must coincide with phase of exact solution.
What phase is discussed in this statement? In terms of previous question, how to show that this replacement leads to correct phase?
References:
- L.D. Landau & E.M. Lifshitz, QM, Vol. 3, 3rd ed, 1981; §49.
Answer
I) Let us for simplicity put the physical constants ℏ=1=m to one. OP is considering the usual transcription u(r)≡rR(r) of the 3D radial TISE into a 1D TISE,
−12u′′(r)+Uℓ(r)u(r) = Eu(r),
where the total potential energy
Uℓ(r) := U(r)+Cℓ2r2
is a sum of a central potential energy U(r) and a centrifugal potential energy Cℓ2r2. Here and below the equation numbers refer to Ref. 1. The constant
Cℓ := ℓ(ℓ+1) = (ℓ+12)2−14
in eq. (49.8b) is the eigenvalue of the ˆL2 operator.
II) We are investigating a bound state where the angular momentum ℓ>0 is non-zero.
We are interested in the situation where the centrifugal potential energy numerically completely dominates [and the potential U(r) can be ignored] in a neighborhood [0,r0+ϵ[ of the classically forbidden interval [0,r0[, where r0 denotes the inner radial turning point. In other words,
E ≈ Cℓ2r20.
We also want the semiclassical WKB approximation to be valid in the interval [0,r0[ (away from the turning point). The semiclassical condition
|λ′(r)| ≪ 1
ℓ ≫ 1.
III) The (absolute value of the) momentum is
p(r) := √2|E−Uℓ(r)| ≈ √Cℓ|r−2−r−20|forr∈[0,r0+ϵ[,
where
√Cℓ (B)= ℓ+12−18ℓ+O(ℓ−2).
The semiclassical connection formulas yield
u(r) ≈ c√p(r)exp[∫r0rdr′ p(r′)]forr < r0,
u(r) ≈ c√p(r)cos[∫rr0dr′ p(r′)−π4]
where c∈C.
IV) The semiclassical approximation (F) behaves as
u(r) ∝ r√Cℓ+12forr → 0+,
while the well-known exact behavior is
u(r) ∝ rℓ+1forr → 0+.
Hence, the semiclassical approximation would have the correct behavior at the origin r=0 if we replace (E) with ℓ+12.
V) Alternatively, in the free case U(r)=0, the semiclassical approximation (48.1) behaves as1
u(r) ∝ sin[√Cℓ(rr0−π2)+π4]forr → ∞,
while the well-known exact behavior is
u(r) ∝ sin[√Cℓrr0−ℓπ2]forr → ∞.
This again suggests to replace (E) with ℓ+12.
References:
- L.D. Landau & E.M. Lifshitz, QM, Vol. 3, 3rd ed, 1981; §49.
1 Momentum integral becomes
1√Cℓ∫rr0dr′ p(r′) = ∫rr01dxx√x2−1 = [√x2−1+arctan1√x2−1]x=rr0x=1
No comments:
Post a Comment