Saturday, April 22, 2017

thermodynamics - How is the efficiency of a heat engine related to the entropy produced during the process?


I'm reading Schroeder's An Introduction to Thermal Physics. Regarding heat engines, it is stated:



Unfortunately, only part of the energy absorbed as heat can be converted to work by a heat engine. The reason is that the heat, as it flows in, brings along entropy, which must somehow be disposed of before the cycle can start over. To get rid of the entropy, every heat engine must dump some waste heat into its environment. The work produced by the engine is the difference between the heat absorbed and the waste heat expelled.



This seems to suggest that to maximize the efficiency of the engine, one should minimize the entropy produced during the process.


Okay, so now let's try to minimize the entropy that is created. The heat that leaves my hot reservoir is Qh. This is the heat that is given to the gas in my engine. So the entropy change for the hot reservoir is QhTh and the entropy change in the gas is QhTgas. Of course, in order for heat to flow, Th must be bigger than Tgas. This implies QhTh<QhTgas

and the total entropy increases during the heat transfer, which is what I would expect. So, to minimize the entropy change, you would want the Tgas to be very close to Th. I believe the same argument can be made for the heat transfer from the gas to the cold reservoir.


However, the equation for the efficiency is


e=1QcQh



which can also be written as


e1TcTh


where Tc is the temperature of the cold reservoir. This equation implies that if the temperatures are similar then the efficiency is essentially zero. If the temperatures are Qh= and Qc=0 then the efficiency is maximized. But by the argument I gave above, it seems that this would create a huge amount of entropy.


Am I making an error in my reasoning?



Answer





How is the efficiency of a heat engine related to the entropy produced during the process?



The maximum efficiency for any heat engine operating between two temperature TH and TC is the Carnot efficiency, given by eC=1TCTH.



Such a heat engine produces no entropy, because we can show that the entropy lost by the hot reservoir is exactly equal to the entropy gain of the cold reservoir, and of course, the system's entropy on the net doesn't change because the system undergoes a cycle.


Any heat engine operating between the same two temperatures whose efficiency is less than eC necessarily increases the entropy of the universe; in particular, the total entropy of the reservoirs must increase. This increase in entropy of the reservoirs is called entropy generation.


Finally, the efficiency of the perfect engine is less than one, necessarily, because the entropy "flow" into the system from the hot reservoir must be at least exactly balanced by the entropy "flow" out of the system into the cold reservoir (because the net change in system entropy must be zero in the cycle), and this necessitates waste heat from the system into the cold reservoir. The fact that eC goes to one in the limit of small ratios TC/TH is a consequence of the fact that QC is small compared to QH. It is not a consequence of the fact that entropy generation is small in this case, because entropy generation is already zero for the Carnot cycle.



Let's concentrate first on the interaction between the system and the hot reservoir. An amount δQH of energy flows into the system from the hot reservoir, which means that the system's entropy changes by dSsys=δQHTsys,

and correspondingly, the reservoir's entropy changes by dShot=δQHTH.
It is straight-forward to show then, that the total change in entropy of system plus environment satisfies dS=dShot+dSsys0,
with equality holding if and only if the system and environment exchange energy via heating when they have equal temperatures, Tsys=TH.


As a consequence, in order to minimize entropy production (and, in fact zero it out completely) during this process, we want Tsys=TH, and the net change in system entropy during this process can then be written as ΔSsys=δQHTsys=QHTH,

since we are assuming that the temperature of the reservoir doesn't change at all during the cycle.


Now, since the system operates on a thermodynamic cycle, and since the system entropy Ssys is a state variable (state function/dS is an exact differential, etc.), it must be true that dSsys,cycle=0.

Therefore, there must be some other process during which the system expels an amount of energy QC to some other reservoir via heating in such a way that the change in system entropy during this new process is the negative of the change in system entropy that we calculated before. By the same argument as above, it must be that this change in entropy is ΔS2=QCTC,
where TC is the temperature of the cold reservoir.


Finally, then, since system entropy is a state variable, 0=ΔS+ΔS2=QHTHQCTC.

Another way of looking at this equation is that the net change in entropy of the hot reservoir is negative the net change in entropy of the cold reservoir during the cycle, and hence the net change in entropy of the universe is zero during the cycle.



Now, none of this seemed related to the fact that efficiency goes to 1 as the ratio of TC to TH goes to zero. This comes in in the following way. First, the net work output during one cycle is Wout=QHQC,

and hence the efficiency of the engine that we've just made is e=WoutQH=1TCTH,
after some algebra. Based on our calculation above, this must be the maximum efficiency of any engine operating between these two temperatures. However, if we change the temperatures, then we can change the efficiency. The reason the efficiency goes up as the temperature ratio goes down is that Wout, being the difference between the heat flows, must go up if, say, we lower TC (because then QC goes down) or if we raise TH (because then QH goes up).



In some sense, this part really doesn't have much to do with entropy at all, because from the thermodynamic perspective, entropy production (which is the increase in entropy of an isolated system) is a measure of how much work we could have done if we had done the process reversibly, but we have already designed the perfect engine operating between those two particular temperatures above, so entropy doesn't have anything else to say.


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...