Wednesday, June 20, 2018

constrained dynamics - Significance of the the Lagrange multipliers in statistical mechanics


In classic thermodynamics one can derive the Maxwell Boltzmann statistics by solving a Lagrange multipliers equation. In this process a new parameter β is introduced to take account of the total energy constraint,



L=β(Eipiϵi)+...


and it is later connected to 1kBT by inserting our knowledge about perfect gases. On a side note, about every book around seems to skip the passage with a frustrating "it can be shown that".


My problem is that, given similar Lagrange multipliers equation, I'm not sure whether one can in general relate E and β: it is evident that β has no physical significance by itself, and it's always bounded to some parameter in the constraints that it is multiplying.


For example, say that I have an array of cells that can be either occupied by 0, 1 or 2 dots. I have some constraints, one of which is the density of the dots ρ. The Lagrange multipliers equation has the form


L=γ(ρp12p2)+...


where pi is the probability of having a cell with i dots. Is there some way to eliminate the γ parameter in the final explicit formula for p1, and use ρ instead?




No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...