Friday, February 22, 2019

mathematics - The Calculator with Misbehaving and


Well, that calculator looked like an ordinary one when I saw it in the shop, but it behaves most extraordinarily! I tried using the + and * keys on small integers, but the results I got were totally wrong and usually decidedly non-integer. However, there does seem to be some method in its madness. Its results are never negative and always fairly small. Provided that it doesn't display Error -- which it does in many cases, unfortunately.


Whatever these operations are that the + and * keys do, they behave in some ways like + and . If I denote them by and , then, for any a,b,c:


ab=ba(ab)c=a(bc)ab=ba(ab)c=a(bc)a(bc)=(ab)(ac)


That is, and are commutative and associative, and is distributive over .



10 has this simple property: for any a, 10a=a.


Hint 1:



Each other number a, as entered on the keypad or displayed, has an internal equivalent f(a). Whenever f(a)+f(b)=f(c), ab=c, and whenever f(a)f(b)=f(c), ab=c. The image or range of f is a field.



I also found this curious relationship between and :


ab=sd


where s and d are the sum and difference of a and b, found, I hasten to add, by using ordinary arithmetic, not by using the + key!


Occasionally it produces an integer. What integers are these values? In each case, give the lowest possible.




  1. 137

  2. z where, for all a, az=a and za=z

  3. 241476

  4. 14643

  5. 131211

  6. 101010


And what's the hint in them taken collectively?



Answer



I have an answer that works. I haven't yet proved it to be unique. We can take




f(x)=2cos(π30x).



Then the mysterious sum-and-difference identity turns into



a standard trigonometrical identity.



The magic number



30 is there to make f(10)=1 as required.




The answers to the requested calculations are, in order,



3, 15, 19, 9, 14, 5



which are the alphabet-positions of the letters of



cosine.



I think the statement in hint 1 is not quite correct, by the way:




we have f(x)=f(-x) for any x and f(x+60)=f(x), so f doesn't have a well-defined inverse, which means that it can't possibly be true that e.g. "whenever f(a)+f(b)=f(c), ab=c" -- because whenever the stated condition holds for a,b,c it also holds for a,b,-c and a,b,c+60 and so on, and ab=c can't be true for more than one choice of c.



No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...