What is the physical significance of the relation E=3NkT for classical ultra-relativistic gas? Why is it greater than ideal gas for which E=(3/2)NkT?
Answer
Nice question. Sometimes we get used to a certain fact, such as equipartition with (1/2)kT per degree of freedom, that we forget that it's not always true, or what assumptions are required in order to make it true. I had to refresh my memory on how equipartition works.
Basically the (1/2)kT form of the equipartition theorem is a special case that only works if the energy consists of terms that are proportional to the squares of the coordinates and momenta. The 1/2 comes from the exponent in these squares.
The WP article on equipartition has a discussion of this. There is a general equipartition theorem that says that
⟨x∂E∂x⟩=kT,
where x could be either a coordinate or a conjugate momentum. If E has a term proportional to xm, the partial derivative has a factor of m in it. In the ultrarelativistic case, where E∝√p2x+p2y+p2z, you don't actually have a dependence on the momenta (momentum components) that breaks down into terms proportional to a power of each momentum. However, I think it's pretty easy to see why we end up with the result we do, because in one dimension, we have |p|=|px|, which does have the right form, with an exponent of 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment