Does anyone have an intuitive explanation of why this is the case?
Answer
This is a note on why angular velocities are vectors, to complement Matt and David's excellent explanations of why rotations are not.
When we say something has a certain angular velocity →ω1, we mean that each part of the thing has a position-dependent velocity
→v1(→r)=→ω1×→r.
We might consider another one of these motions
→v2(→r)=→ω2×→r
and wonder what happens when we add them. We get
→v1(→r)+→v2(→r)=→ω1×→r+→ω2×→r.
The cross product is linear, so this is equivalent to
(→v1+→v2)(→r)=(→ω1+→ω2)×→r,
so it makes fine sense to add angular velocities by vector addition.
No comments:
Post a Comment