Friday, May 29, 2015

group theory - How is it that angular velocities are vectors, while rotations aren't?


Does anyone have an intuitive explanation of why this is the case?



Answer



This is a note on why angular velocities are vectors, to complement Matt and David's excellent explanations of why rotations are not.


When we say something has a certain angular velocity $\vec{\omega_1}$, we mean that each part of the thing has a position-dependent velocity


$\vec{v_1}(\vec{r}) = \vec{\omega_1} \times \vec{r}$.


We might consider another one of these motions


$\vec{v_2}(\vec{r}) = \vec{\omega_2} \times \vec{r}$


and wonder what happens when we add them. We get



$\vec{v_1}(\vec{r}) + \vec{v_2}(\vec{r}) = \vec{\omega_1} \times \vec{r} + \vec{\omega_2} \times \vec{r}$.


The cross product is linear, so this is equivalent to


$(\vec{v_1} + \vec{v_2})(\vec{r}) = (\vec{\omega_1} + \vec{\omega_2}) \times \vec{r}$,


so it makes fine sense to add angular velocities by vector addition.


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...