The following image is taken from p. 85 in the textbook Topological Solitons by N. Manton and P.M. Sutcliffe:
What I don't understand from the above statement:
- why e(μ) has minimum for d=2,3, whereas when d=4, e(μ) is scale independent and stationary points and vacuum solutions are possible?
- How e(μ) is a continuous function bounded by zero?
Answer
Generalized versions of Derrick's No-Go Theorem compare spatially scaled, non-trivial, time-independent, finite-energy, classical, field-configurations to exclude the existence of static solitons. (Since we are only considering time-independent field-configurations, there is no kinetic energy T=0. Therefore the stationary action principle δS=0 amounts to minimize the (potential) energy T+V. Here S:=∫dt L, and L:=T−V. See also this Phys.SE post.)
Let d be the number of spatial dimensions. The (potential) energy of the μ-scaled configuration is
e(μ) = ∑n∈{0,2,4}μn−dEn≥0,
where we assume that the scale parameter
μ ∈ ]0,∞[
is strictly positive, and that the energies
En ≥ 0,n∈{0,2,4}
are non-negative. From this it already follows that the (μ-scaled potential) energy e:]0,∞[→[0,∞[ is a non-negative and continuous function, and in particular that it is bounded from below, cf. some of OP's subquestions (v1).
Case E0,E4>0 and d≤3: Then e(0) := limμ→0+e(μ) = ∞ = limμ→∞e(μ) =: e(∞), so that there must exist an interior1 (relative) minimum, and therefore Derrick's No-Go conclusion does not apply.
Case d≥4: The function e is monotonically weakly decreasing. [The word weakly means here that it could be (locally) constant.] The only possibility to have an interior minimum (and therefore evade Derrick's No-Go conclusion) is if E0=0=E2 and if moreover either (i) d=4 or (ii) E4=0. The former case corresponds to pure 4+1 gauge theory, which indeed has non-trivial static soliton solutions with E4>0. The latter case corresponds to vacuum solutions e≡0. The function e is in both cases a constant function, i.e. independent of the scale μ.
Case E0=0=E2: The function e is monotonic. The only possibility to have an interior minimum (and therefore evade Derrick's No-Go conclusion) is, if (i) d=4, or if (ii) E4=0, i.e. we are back in the previous case (2).
References:
N. Manton and P.M. Sutcliffe, Topological Solitons, 2004, Section 4.2.
S. Coleman, Aspects of symmetry, 1985. Note that Sidney calls solitons for lumps.
R. Rajaraman, Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory, 1987.
--
1 An interior minimum point μ means that μ is different from the boundary 0 and ∞.
No comments:
Post a Comment