On page 18, before the occupation number variables for states i and j are changed ni→n′i=ni−1 and nj→n′j=nj+1 respectively, could we not have rewritten eq. 1.58 as $$i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} |\Psi(t)\rangle \\= \dots + \sum_{n_1 n_2 \dots n_\infty} \sum_{i
Friday, July 15, 2016
quantum mechanics - Fetter & Walecka's derivation of second quantised canonical Schrodinger equation for fermions
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?
I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...
-
Are C1, C2 and C3 connected in parallel, or C2, C3 in parallel and C1 in series with C23? Btw it appeared as a question in the basic physics...
-
I have read the radiation chapter, where I have been introduced with the terms emissivity and absorptivity. emissivity tells about the abili...
-
A charged particle undergoing an acceleration radiates photons. Let's consider a charge in a freely falling frame of reference. In such ...
No comments:
Post a Comment