This is a complete rewriting of the older post, making more clear the problem.
The issue here is to compute the |M|2=4a2(δadδbc−12δabδcd)2(uμ1bˉu1μauμ1′bˉu1′μa)×(uν2′dˉu2′νcuν2dˉu2νc)
One of terms of the above amplitude is: T1=δadδbcδadδbcω=4(uμ1bˉu1μauμ1′bˉu1′μa)(uν2′aˉu2′νbuν2aˉu2νb),
Question: I'm having a problem seeing how could I simplify this expression. Can I simultaneously reform this term to a trace? The possibilities are a trace over:
- Just spin indices; but what happens then with the internal indices?
- Internal isospin trace; but what then happens with spin indices?
- A trace over both indices?
Thank you.
Details
Assume a Lagrangian with an interaction term of the form Lint=ˉψϕ⋅τψ , globally symmetric under the action of SU(2) group. Think that the field ψ describes a nucleon as an isospin SU(2) doublet with entries the proton and neutron and the field ϕ an isospin triplet (in the adjoint representation) of SU(2) formed by the three scalar pions.
The problem is to calculate the invariant Feynman amplitude. We have, writing all the indices explicitly:
M=a(q2)(ˉu1′μaτabkuμ1b)(u2′νcτcdkˉuν2d),
This way one should recognise the scalar nature over both μ,ν Lorentz indices and over a,b,c,d,k isospin indices. A similar calculation can be found in chapter 46 of Srednicki, without the extra internal symmetry and it's indices. There, it's simple then to recognise the trace over spin indices of the |M|2=MM∗.
For the generators there is the following completeness relation: τkabτkcd=2(δadδbc−12δabδcd).
So finally, the amplitude is:
|M|2=4a2(δadδbc−12δabδcd)2(uμ1bˉu1μauμ1′bˉu1′μa)×(uν2′dˉu2′νcuν2dˉu2νc)
The delta identity gives three terms; the first, let's say T1, is: T1=δadδbcδadδbcω=4(uμ1bˉu1μauμ1′bˉu1′μa)×(uν2′aˉu2′νbuν2aˉu2νb),
No comments:
Post a Comment