In eq. (22.20) on p. 135 in Srednicki he defines the functional integral
Z(J)=∫Dϕexp[i(S+∫d4yJaϕa)],
where S and Ja are the action and sources respectively (sum over a). What I don't get is that when he in eq. (22.21) considers a small variation δZ he seem to get the variation of the action inside an integral (I get it without the integral) as follows:
0=δZ(J)=iZ(J)×[∫d4x(δSδϕa(x)+Ja(x))δϕa(x)].
My attempt:
0=δZ(J)=δZδϕb(x)δϕb(x)=∫Dϕδϕb(x)[δδϕb(x)ei(S+∫d4yJa(y)ϕa(y))].
The box becomes:
[δδϕb(x)ei(S+∫d4yJa(y)ϕa(y))]=δδϕa(y)ei(S+∫d4yJa(y)ϕa(y))δϕa(y)δϕb(x)=δabδ4(x−y)ei(S+∫d4yJa(y)ϕa(y))×iδδϕa(y)(S+∫d4yJa(y)ϕa(y))⏟Λ.
Lambda becomes (?) Λ=δSδϕa(y)+∫d4yJa(y).
What I'm I doing wrong here?
Answer
Let's consider a single scalar field for simplicity. The following step is a misapplication of the functional derivative: δZ(J)=δZδϕ(x)δϕ(x)
What's going on here is a change of variables in the functional integral. The measure is assumed to be invariant under this change of variables, so what's left is that the terms inside of the exponential can change. To deal with the term involving S, we note that under the change of variables ϕ→ϕ+δϕ, the action changes as follows: S[ϕ]→S[ϕ+δϕ]=S[ϕ]+δS[ϕ]+O(δϕ2)
Notes. I used integration by parts and the following functional derivative identity in the computations above: δϕ(x)δϕ(y)=δ(x−y)
No comments:
Post a Comment