In the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, HΨ=iℏ∂∂tΨ, the Hamiltonian operator is given by
H=−ℏ22m∇2+V.
Why can't we consider iℏ∂∂t as an operator for the Hamiltonian as well? My answer (which I am not sure about) is the following:
HΨ=iℏ∂∂tΨ is not an equation for defining H. This situation is similar to F=ma. Newton's second law is not an equation for defining F; F must be provided independently.
Is my reasoning (and the analogy) correct, or is the answer deeper than that?
No comments:
Post a Comment