Wednesday, December 24, 2014

optics - How does one calculate the polarization state of random light after total internal reflection


How does one calculate the polarization state of random light after having been totally reflected by a single dielectric interface? Please consider pure specular reflexions from a plane interface between two dielectric mediums of indexes n1,n2 when the angle of incidence θ1 is greater than the critical angle arcsin(n2/n1).



Answer



I'll stick to pure total internal, specular reflexion in this answer.


When TIR happens, both linear polarisation components are fully relfected, but the phase change (the Goos-Hänchen shift) is different for the two states. In scalar theory the Goos-Hänchen shift (see my answer here) for the two states, but the full vector theory shows a subtle difference. What this means practically is that the two polarisation states seem to reflect from ever so slightly different depths into the denser medium beyond the totally internally reflecting interface.


The Fresnel equations still apply in this situation. Now, of course, we get sinθt>1 so that cosθt=1sinθ2t is imaginary. We interpret the trigonometric functions exactly as they are interpreted in the derivation of the Fresnel equations (e.g. in Reference [1]), to wit, the sine and cosine are the ratios kx/k and kz/k of the wavevector components tangential and normal to the interface, respectively. The cosine is imaginary beyond the interface, so the wave is evanescent and exponentially decaying with depth as in my answer cited above. So, from the Fresnel equations:


rs=n1cosθin2cosθtn1cosθi+n2cosθt=n1c1in2c2n1c1+in2c2


ts=2n1cosθin1cosθi+n2cosθt=2n1c1n1c1+in2c2



rp=n2cosθin1cosθtn1cosθt+n2cosθi=n2c1in1c2n1c2+in2c1=i


tp=2n1cosθin1cosθt+n2cosθi=2n1c1n1c2+in2c1


where c1=cosθ1 and c2=Im(cosθ2) are both real numbers. Take heed that the reflexion co-efficients are either a complex numbers of the form rs=z/z or rp=i and thus have unity magnitude, so all the power is reflected. The Goos-Hänchen shifts for the two orthogonal linear polarisations are:


ϕs=2arg(n1c1+in2c2)=2arctan(n2c2n1c1)


ϕp=π2


which are almost equal in most cases: they deviate more significantly from one another for highly glancing angles θ1π/2 (which condition invalidates the scalar theory of my other answer).


In particular, as the incidence angle approaches π/2 and the reflexion becomes highly grazing, ϕsπ and ϕpπ/2. That is, the TIR mechanism mimics a quarter wave plate.


So, for your random polarisation, you are going to either represent it as a known, pure polarisation with a 2×1 Jones vector X=(xpxs) and transform it by:


XUX;whereU=(eiϕp00eiϕs)


or if the light is depolarised (a mixed state) you will use the Mueller calculus / density matrix formalism:



ρUρU;whereρ=3j=0sjσj


σ0=id is the 2×2 identity matrix, σj the Pauli spin matrice and the co-efficients sj are the four Stokes parameters as described in my answer on dealing with calculations with depolarised light.


Reference:


[1] §1.5 "Reflexion and Refraction of a Plane Wave" in the seventh edition of Born and Wolf, "Principles of Optics".


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...