I'm trying to understand the following equation, used in the derivation of the equations of motion. Let S=−12∫F∧∗F and F=dA. Let δ denote variation. Then
δS=−∫dδA∧∗F.
(In the full derivation we then int. by parts and get d∗F=0 for the EOM with no currents.)
In tensor notation, F=Fμν and (I think) (∗F)=(∗F)γδ=√|g|ϵαβγδFαβ (where |g| is the determinant of the metric). The wedge product is antisymmetric, so (I think) F∧∗F=ϵμνγδFμν(∗F)γδ. After these considerations, I do not see how we end up with the above result; I'd expect two terms from the product rule for variations, for instance, and where did the factor of 12 go?
Answer
Actually, once being in differential form formalism, the best is to stay in it and thereby benefit from it. In this sense let's evaluate the variation of the EM-action using F=dA:
δS=−12δ∫VdA∧⋆dA=−12∫V(dδA∧⋆dA+dA∧⋆dδA)=−12∫V2dδA∧⋆dA
Here we used a hodge operator rule for forms λ,ω∈Λk for λ=dδA and ω=dA:
λ∧⋆ω=(−1)q<λ,ω>e=(−1)q<ω,λ>e=ω∧⋆λ
with e:=e1∧e2∧…∧en∈Λn
Second step (product rule):
d(δA∧⋆dA)=dδA∧⋆dA−δA∧d⋆dA
It follows:
−dδA∧⋆dA=−d(δA∧⋆dA)−δA∧d⋆dA
Therefore we get for the varied action integral:
δS=∫Vd(δA∧⋆dA)+∫VδA∧d⋆dA
We transform the first volume integral into an integral over the volume's surface according to Stokes theorem and realize that the variations δA vanish on the surface: 0=δS=∫∂VδA∧⋆dA+∫VδA∧d⋆dA=∫VδA∧d⋆dA
As the integral ∫VδA∧d⋆dA=0
d⋆dA=0
No comments:
Post a Comment