Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Why can't compact symplectic groups Sp(n)equivUSp(2n)equivU(2n)capSp(2n,mathbbC) be gauge groups in Yang-Mills theory?



The gauge groups in Yang-Mills theory can be things like O(10) or SU(5) but continuing the pattern from real to complex, the next obvious thing would be quaternion matrices. A group like U(4,H) where H is the quaternions. This is another name for Sp(4) (according to Wikipedia!).


A group like U(4,H) I always thought would be interesting since it would be split U(1,H)×U(3,H) and U(1,H)=SU(2) and U(3,H) would have subgroup SU(3).


But I have never seen a Yang-Mills theory with a compact symplectic gauge group so apparently there must be a good reason for that.


Do you know the reason? Is there a theoretical reason or an experimental reason?



Answer



The structure of standard model SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1) is chiral which basically tells you the necessity of chiral fermions. If left-handed fermions transform under a representation R of the symmetry group then due to charge-conjugation relating left-handed and right-handed fermions as ψRight=C(¯ψC)TLeft

and so, right handed fermions should transform under the complex conjugate representation R. If R is real or pseudoreal, then left-handed and right-handed fermions transform in same representation of the group and the theory is known to be a vector like theory (QCD). To have chiral structure of fermions, one has to have RR which demands R to be complex.


Even though QCD is vector like and 2=2, the whole standard model is chiral as can be seen by writing R for left-handed fermions as, R=(3,2)16+(3,1)23+(3,1)13+(1,2)12+(1,1)1

the complex conjugate to which is not same as R.


It is known that USp(2n) for n>2 admits real and pseudo-real representations (Weinberg Vol. 2, chapter 22) and USp(4) is not big enough to contain standard model.


Moreover using a Sp(n) like gauge group demands even number of fermion multiplets otherwise the gauge theory will show a non-perturbative anomaly1 involving fourth homotopy group of Sp(n).


1- Ed Witten, nucl. phys. B223 (1983),433-444.



No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...