The gauge groups in Yang-Mills theory can be things like O(10) or SU(5) but continuing the pattern from real to complex, the next obvious thing would be quaternion matrices. A group like U(4,H) where H is the quaternions. This is another name for Sp(4) (according to Wikipedia!).
A group like U(4,H) I always thought would be interesting since it would be split U(1,H)×U(3,H) and U(1,H)=SU(2) and U(3,H) would have subgroup SU(3).
But I have never seen a Yang-Mills theory with a compact symplectic gauge group so apparently there must be a good reason for that.
Do you know the reason? Is there a theoretical reason or an experimental reason?
Answer
The structure of standard model SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1) is chiral which basically tells you the necessity of chiral fermions. If left-handed fermions transform under a representation R of the symmetry group then due to charge-conjugation relating left-handed and right-handed fermions as ψRight=C(¯ψC)TLeft
Even though QCD is vector like and 2=2∗, the whole standard model is chiral as can be seen by writing R for left-handed fermions as, R=(3,2)16+(3∗,1)−23+(3∗,1)13+(1,2)−12+(1,1)1
It is known that USp(2n) for n>2 admits real and pseudo-real representations (Weinberg Vol. 2, chapter 22) and USp(4) is not big enough to contain standard model.
Moreover using a Sp(n) like gauge group demands even number of fermion multiplets otherwise the gauge theory will show a non-perturbative anomaly1 involving fourth homotopy group of Sp(n).
1- Ed Witten, nucl. phys. B223 (1983),433-444.
No comments:
Post a Comment