While studying the Dirac equation, I came across this enigmatic passage on p. 551 in From Classical to Quantum Mechanics by G. Esposito, G. Marmo, G. Sudarshan regarding the γ matrices:
(γ0)2=I,(γj)2=−I (j=1,2,3)
γ0γj+γjγ0=0γjγk+γkγj=0, j≠kIn looking for solutions of these equations in terms of matrices, one finds that they must have as order a multiple of 4, and that there exists a solution of order 4.
Obviously the word order here means dimension. In my QM classes the lecturer referenced chapter 5 from Advanced Quantum Mechanics by F. Schwabl, especially as regards the dimension of Dirac γ matrices. However there it is stated only that, since the number of positive and negative eigenvalues of α and βk must be equal, n is even. Moreover, n=2 is not sufficient, so n=4 is the smallest possible dimension in which it is possible to realize the desired algebraic structure.
While I got that the smallest dimension is 4, I fail to find any argument to reject the possibility that n=6 could be a solution. I also checked this Phys.SE post, but I didn't find it helpful at all.
Can anyone help me?
Answer
Let us generalize from four space-time dimensions to a d-dimensional Clifford algebra C. Define
p := [d2],
where [⋅] denotes the integer part. OP's question then becomes
Why must the dimension n of a finite dimensional representation V be a multiple of 2p?
Proof: If C⊆End(V) and V are both real, we may complexify, so we may from now on assume that they are both complex. Then the signature of C is irrelevant, and hence we might as well assume positive signature. In other words, we assume we are given n×n matrices γ1,…,γd, that satisfy
{γμ,γν} = 2δμν1,μ,ν ∈ {1,…d}.
We may define
Σμν := i2[γμ,γν] = −Σνμ,μ,ν ∈ {1,…d}.
In particular, define p elements
H1,…,Hp,
as
Hr := Σr,p+r,r ∈ {1,…p}.
Note that the elements H1,…,Hp, (and γd if d is odd), are a set of mutually commuting involutions. Therefore, according to Lie's Theorem, then H1,…,Hp, (and γd if d is odd), must have a common eigenvector v.
Since H1,…,Hp are involutions, their eigenvalues are ±1. In other words,
H1v = (−1)j1v,…,Hpv = (−1)jpv,
where
j1,…,jp ∈ {0,1}
are either zero or one.
Apply next the p first gamma matrices
γ1,γ2,…γp,
to the common eigenvector v, so that
v(i1,…,ip) := γi11γi22⋯γippv,
where the indices
i1,…,ip ∈ {0,1}
are either zero or one.
It is straightforward to check that the 2p vectors v(i1,…,ip) also are common eigenvectors for H1,…,Hp. In detail,
Hrv(i1,…,ip) = (−1)ir+jrv(i1,…,ip).
Note that each eigenvector v(i1,…,ip) has a unique pattern of eigenvalues for the tuple (H1,…,Hp), so the 2p vectors v(i1,…,ip) must be linearly independent.
Since
γp+r = iHrγr,r ∈ {1,…p},
we see that
W := spanC{v(i1,…,ip)∣i1,…,ip ∈ {0,1}}
is an invariant subspace W⊆V.
This shows that that any irreducible complex representation of a complex d-dimensional Clifford algebra is 2p-dimensional.
Finally, we believe (but did not check) that a finite dimensional representation V of a complex Clifford algebra is always completely reducible, i.e. a finite sum of irreducible representations, and hence the dimension n of V must be a multiple of 2p.
No comments:
Post a Comment