Thursday, October 30, 2014

representation theory - Dimension of Dirac gamma matrices


While studying the Dirac equation, I came across this enigmatic passage on p. 551 in From Classical to Quantum Mechanics by G. Esposito, G. Marmo, G. Sudarshan regarding the γ matrices:




(γ0)2=I,(γj)2=I (j=1,2,3)

γ0γj+γjγ0=0
γjγk+γkγj=0, jk
In looking for solutions of these equations in terms of matrices, one finds that they must have as order a multiple of 4, and that there exists a solution of order 4.



Obviously the word order here means dimension. In my QM classes the lecturer referenced chapter 5 from Advanced Quantum Mechanics by F. Schwabl, especially as regards the dimension of Dirac γ matrices. However there it is stated only that, since the number of positive and negative eigenvalues of α and βk must be equal, n is even. Moreover, n=2 is not sufficient, so n=4 is the smallest possible dimension in which it is possible to realize the desired algebraic structure.


While I got that the smallest dimension is 4, I fail to find any argument to reject the possibility that n=6 could be a solution. I also checked this Phys.SE post, but I didn't find it helpful at all.


Can anyone help me?



Answer



Let us generalize from four space-time dimensions to a d-dimensional Clifford algebra C. Define


p := [d2],


where [] denotes the integer part. OP's question then becomes




Why must the dimension n of a finite dimensional representation V be a multiple of 2p?



Proof: If CEnd(V) and V are both real, we may complexify, so we may from now on assume that they are both complex. Then the signature of C is irrelevant, and hence we might as well assume positive signature. In other words, we assume we are given n×n matrices γ1,,γd, that satisfy


{γμ,γν} = 2δμν1,μ,ν  {1,d}.


We may define


Σμν := i2[γμ,γν] = Σνμ,μ,ν  {1,d}.


In particular, define p elements


H1,,Hp,


as


Hr := Σr,p+r,r  {1,p}.



Note that the elements H1,,Hp, (and γd if d is odd), are a set of mutually commuting involutions. Therefore, according to Lie's Theorem, then H1,,Hp, (and γd if d is odd), must have a common eigenvector v.


Since H1,,Hp are involutions, their eigenvalues are ±1. In other words,


H1v = (1)j1v,,Hpv = (1)jpv,


where


j1,,jp  {0,1}


are either zero or one.


Apply next the p first gamma matrices


γ1,γ2,γp,


to the common eigenvector v, so that


v(i1,,ip) := γi11γi22γippv,



where the indices


i1,,ip  {0,1}


are either zero or one.


It is straightforward to check that the 2p vectors v(i1,,ip) also are common eigenvectors for H1,,Hp. In detail,


Hrv(i1,,ip) = (1)ir+jrv(i1,,ip).


Note that each eigenvector v(i1,,ip) has a unique pattern of eigenvalues for the tuple (H1,,Hp), so the 2p vectors v(i1,,ip) must be linearly independent.


Since


γp+r = iHrγr,r  {1,p},


we see that


W := spanC{v(i1,,ip)i1,,ip  {0,1}}



is an invariant subspace WV.


This shows that that any irreducible complex representation of a complex d-dimensional Clifford algebra is 2p-dimensional.


Finally, we believe (but did not check) that a finite dimensional representation V of a complex Clifford algebra is always completely reducible, i.e. a finite sum of irreducible representations, and hence the dimension n of V must be a multiple of 2p.


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...