I'm interested in the retarded propagator for a free massless Dirac fermion, i.e. solutions ψ to the inhomogeneous PDE
(∂_t- \nabla·\vec σ) ψ(x,t) = f(x,t)
with boundary conditions
\quad ψ(x,t) \to 0 \text{ for } t \to -∞
where \vec σ = (σ_1,σ_2,σ_3)^T are the three Pauli matrices. (The boundary conditions can be even more restrictive, I just want the solution to decay sufficiently quickly at infinity so that it becomes unique and has a well-defined Fourier transform.)
Now, solving the Dirac equation is a standard exercise in virtually every QFT book, but all the books I've looked at only consider the Fourier transform of the propagator.
However, I am interested in the real space formula for the retarded propagator
Using the retarded propagator for the wave equation in 3+1 dimensions, we can write
ψ(x,t) = (∂_t + \nabla·\vec σ)(∂_t^2 - \nabla^2)^{-1} f(x,t)
= (∂_t + \nabla·\vec σ) \frac1{4π·\text{something}}∫d^3x'dt' \frac1{|x-x'|}\delta(|x-x'|-|t-t'|) f(x',t')
but this formula strikes me as seriously weird: carrying out the differentiation with respect to x and t will differentiate the \delta-function in the integral, which means that the solution depends on the derivatives of the function f. This goes against my intuition that a linear first-order PDE should depend on the initial values directly, and not on their time and space derivatives!
Is there a reference where I can find a discussion of the retarded propagator of the (massless) Dirac equation in real space?
Answer
The real space propagator for the massive Dirac fermion in 3+1 dimensions is calculated in R. Feynman's book Quantum Electrodynamics (Lecture 17, page 84 in the edition linked to).
The result is very much as indicated in the question: first solve the wave equation, then differentiate the solution with the Dirac operator again. In particular, Feynman calculates the propagator of the Klein-Gordon equation in real space:
I_+(t,x) = ∫ \frac{d^4p}{(2π)^4} \frac{\exp[-i(p\cdot x)]}{p^2 - m^2 + i\varepsilon} = -(4π)^{-1} \delta(s^2) + \frac{m}{8πs}H_1^{(2)}(ms)
Here, s = +(t^2-x^2)^{1/2} for t>|x| and s = -i(x^2-t^2)^{1/2} for t < |x|. Moreover, \delta(s^2) is a delta function and H^{(2)}_1(ms) is a Hankel function. Then, you have to differentiate the delta function, indeed.
However, note that to be physically meaningful, the propagator G(x_2,t_2;x_1,t_1) for the Dirac equation should only take into account the positive energy states for the retarded time frame t_2 - t_1 > 0, while the advanced portion t_2 - t_1 < 0 should only take into account the negative energy eigenstates (holes).
No comments:
Post a Comment