Monday, December 7, 2015

lagrangian formalism - Can I really take the classical field equations at face value in QFT?


To be concrete, let's say I have a relativistic ϕ4 theory [with Minkowski signature (+,,,)]



L = 12(μϕμϕm2ϕ2)λ4!ϕ4.


The classical equation of motion for ϕ is:


(+m2)ϕ+λ3!ϕ3 = 0.


I knew that canonical quantization is basically replacing all Poisson' brackets with (anti-)commutators. From that point of view, I would expect a classical field equation to remain valid as an operator equation even after quantization. Am I wrong?


If I am indeed correct, then specifically to the ϕ4 example, does that mean


[(+m2)ϕ+λ3!ϕ3]O = 0


for any operator O, in the full interacting theory?


And how do I reconcile this with the path integral picture?


Only the classical paths follow classical equations of motion to the letters. But to quantize a theory, every path is assigned a weight eiS, and obviously none of these new inclusions will follow the classical equations. Then, how can the field equations still hold?




No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...