I have some problem to intuitively understand why the kinetic energy grows quadratically with the velocity (at least in non-relativistic case).
Assume the following experiment: we launch an unmanned rocket ship from an asteroid, let it accelerate time T in a direction and then time 2T in the backwards direction; so, in time 2T it has velocity zero and in 3T, it should be in the same position as in time T, just with opposite velocity. Then we let it fly freely until it hits the asteroid and let's assume that all kinetic energy transforms to heat.
Repeat the same experiment with T replaced by λT; the final velocity will be λ times bigger and we used λ-times so much fuel for the accelerations. But this can hardly be converted to λ2-times the energy.
Is the solution hidden in the fact that the fuel itself has a non-neglectable weight?
Answer
Let's take the things step by step, from linear momentum conservation. Of course, the rigorous treatment is by Tsiolkovsky's law. Here I am saying something less rigorous but intuitive.
To increase the velocity from zero to ΔV you consume a mass of fuel Δm. When I say from zero, I mean that I consider a discrete series of quick fuel consumptions. In such a consumption event, in the frame of reference of the rocket its velocity is zero, and we want to acquire a velocity ΔV. Then, the momentum conservation says
Δm.v=(M−Δm)ΔV
\dfrac{{Δm v^2} + {M (ΔV)^2}}{2} = E_{Δm}
where M is the mass of the rocket before consuming Δm of fuel, v is the expulsed gas velocity, and E_{Δm} is the energy that Δm of fuel can release. Let's use absolute values for velocities, for not to carry in all the formulas the minus caused by the opposite direction of the rocket and gas velocities.
Thus, v = \dfrac{(M - Δm)ΔV}{Δm}, and (ΔV)^2 = \dfrac{2E_{Δm}}{ [M^2/Δm - (M - Δm)]} ,
from which
ΔV = \sqrt{\dfrac{2E_{Δm}}{ [M^2/Δm - (M - Δm)]}} .
So, even in my non-rigorous treatment, the velocity and the quantity of burnt fuel are not in linear relationship.
I hope it helps.
No comments:
Post a Comment