Friday, January 17, 2020

quantum mechanics - Collective angular momentum , Dicke states and indistinguishable particles


During course of quantum mechanics we dealt with addition of angular momenta. If we have two particles with spin j1 and j2 we can introduce total spin operator:


J=j(1)+j(2),

and new basis: J2|J,M=J(J+1)|J,M,
Jz|J,M=M|J,M,
where J=|j1j2|,,j1+j2 and M=J,,J.


The same thing can be done for N particles with e.q. spin 1/2. One can introduce collective spin operator:


J=Ni=1j(i),

and new basis in the Hilbert space H=H1HN, J2|J,M=J(J+1)|J,M,
Jz|J,M=M|J,M.
States with highest momentum J=N/2 are known as the Dicke states: |N/2,M,  M=N/2,,N/2
I always thought that these states are not degenerate with respect to a quantum number M, but here they claim that only symmetric Dicke states are uniquely defined. I can't see this cause I construct states with M less than N/2 by applying the lowering operator to |N/2,N/2 state (this seems to give me only symmetric Dicke states).


Another issue is the Hilbert space itself. I think it does not take into account that particles are indistinguishable. We simply deal with tensor product of single particle spaces. No symmetrization or antisymmetrization. Am I right?




No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...