During course of quantum mechanics we dealt with addition of angular momenta. If we have two particles with spin j1 and j2 we can introduce total spin operator:
J=j(1)+j(2),
and new basis: J2|J,M⟩=J(J+1)|J,M⟩,
Jz|J,M⟩=M|J,M⟩,
where J=|j1−j2|,…,j1+j2 and M=−J,…,J.
The same thing can be done for N particles with e.q. spin 1/2. One can introduce collective spin operator:
J=N∑i=1j(i),
and new basis in the Hilbert space H=H1⊗…⊗HN, J2|J,M⟩=J(J+1)|J,M⟩,
Jz|J,M⟩=M|J,M⟩.
States with highest momentum J=N/2 are known as the Dicke states: |N/2,M⟩, M=−N/2,…,N/2
I always thought that these states are not degenerate with respect to a quantum number M, but here they claim that only symmetric Dicke states are uniquely defined. I can't see this cause I construct states with M less than N/2 by applying the lowering operator to |N/2,N/2⟩ state (this seems to give me only symmetric Dicke states).
Another issue is the Hilbert space itself. I think it does not take into account that particles are indistinguishable. We simply deal with tensor product of single particle spaces. No symmetrization or antisymmetrization. Am I right?
No comments:
Post a Comment