In these lecture notes the static isotropic metric is treated as follows (p. 71):
Take a spherically symmetric, bounded, static distribution of matter, then we will have a spherically symmetric metric which is asymptotically the Minkowski metric. It has the form (in spherical coordinates): ds2=B(r)c2dt2−A(r)dr2−C(r)r2(dθ2+sin2θdϕ2)
And then it goes on eliminating C and expanding A and B in powers of 1r. No explanations are given on why we can assume that form for the metric. Could someone explain why, please?
Personally, I would rather assume the form (in cartesian coordinates): ds2=f(r)dt2−g(r)(dx2+dy2+dz2)
which would certainly give a spherically symmetric metric, and then change to spherical coordinates, obtaining something looking like: ds2=f(r)dt2−g(r)(dr2+r2dθ2+r2sin2θdϕ2)
which looks substantially different from the above. Is this approach wrong? Why?
By the way, don't be afraid of getting technical. I have a pretty good mathematical basis on the subject (a course of one year on differential geometry).
No comments:
Post a Comment