Tuesday, February 9, 2016

quantum field theory - Why is slow-roll is prefered over non-slow-roll inflation?


Wikipedia says that in new inflation, the slow-roll conditions must be satisfied for inflation to occur.


What is fast-roll or non-slow-roll inflation and why is slow-roll is prefered?



Answer



Slow roll inflation is quantified in terms of a sequence of parameters which measure the local smoothness of the inflaton potential. The lowest-order parameter is $\epsilon \propto (V'/V)^2$, the next-lowest is $\eta \propto V''/V$, and so on. Higher-order parameters measure ever more localized kinks in the potential.


The values of $\epsilon$, $\eta$, etc are constrained by a few different things. For one, inflation needs to last long enough to solve the horizon and flatness problems. Inflation occurs as long as $\epsilon < 1$, and its rate of change is $$\frac{{\rm d}\epsilon}{{\rm d}N} = 2\epsilon (\eta - \epsilon)$$ where $N$ is a time variable denoting the number of e-folds before the end of inflation: current estimates require that $\Delta N$ be at least around 60. So if $\epsilon$ is too large (the potential has too steep a grade), then the field rolls down to quickly to drive sufficient inflation. Also, if $\eta$ is too large (the potential has too much curvature) then a similar fate awaits. So the first reason we want inflation to be "slow roll" is that we want to get enough inflation, and we need a reasonably flat potential to achieve that.



The other big reason that slow roll inflation is desired is due to the influence that inflationary dynamics have on the shape of the density perturbation spectrum, $P(k)$. Measurements of the cosmic microwave background and large scale structure surveys have revealed that $P(k)$ is very nearly scale invariant, $P(k) \sim k^{n-1}$ with $n \approx 1$. A lengthy and involved (though fun and rewarding) calculation reveals that we can connect the spectral parameters directly to the inflationary dynamics in terms of the slow roll parameters. In particular, $$n - 1= 4\epsilon -2\eta,$$ revealing that slow roll inflation leads to a nearly scale invariant power spectrum.


None of this is to say that there cannot be non-slow roll behavior during inflation, just that it needs to be the exception rather than the rule. There are many models involving localized, transient kinks in the potential that create interesting features in the spectrum on specific scales. People have also looked at "fast roll" inflation in which, though the potential may be flat, the field velocity is high compared to the expansion rate. This is also non-slow roll behavior and one finds that the resulting power spectrum deviates from a power law on the affected scales (fast rolling fields tend to slow down even as they roll down hill during inflation, due to Hubble drag, and so slow roll inflation can be achieved even with initially fast-rolling fields).


Lastly, we only have observations across a limited range of scales (maybe the first dozen or so e-folds of inflation), and so the potential could do all sorts of non-slow roll tricks on these scales (both larger and smaller) as long as sufficient inflation is achieved and there aren't dramatic spikes in the power spectrum (that might, for example, generate unacceptable amounts of primordial black holes.)


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...