Saturday, December 30, 2017

general relativity - Friedmann vacuum solution linear rather than exponential?


Does the Friedmann vacuum equation have a linear solution rather than an exponential one?



Using natural units one can write Friedmann's equation for the vacuum as $$ \begin{eqnarray} \left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 &=& \frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho_{vac}\\\tag{1} &=& L^2 \left(\frac{\rho_0}{L^4}\right) \end{eqnarray} $$


where I define the Planck length $L=(8\pi G \hbar / 3 c^3)^{1/2}$, $\hbar = c = 1$, and $\rho_0$ is a dimenionless constant.


Now let us interpret the Planck length $L$ to be the size of the smallest volume of space that can be described by general relativity.


But the Weyl postulate, together with cosmological observations, also imply that space is expanding.


Therefore we must have


$$L = a(t) L_0\tag{2}$$


where $L_0$ is the Planck length measured at the reference time $t_0$ where $a(t_0)=1$.


Inserting Eq.(2) into Eq.(1) we find


$$\left(\frac{\dot a}{a}\right)^2 = L_0^2 \left(\frac{\rho_0}{a^2L_0^4}\right)\tag{3}$$


where the Friedmann equation (3) has been rescaled in terms of the Planck length $L_0$ measured at the reference time $t_0$.



Eq.(3) has a linear solution


$$a(t) = \frac{t}{t_0}.$$


The scaled mass density $\rho(t)$ of the vacuum is not constant but rather given by


$$\rho(t) = \frac{\rho_0}{a^2 L_0^4} = \frac{1}{t^2 L_0^2}.$$




No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...