I have a conjecture about quantum channels. On which examples should I test it before I try to prove it, ask it on StackExchange, or write a paper about it?
(Note: This is meant to be a reference question. But whenever I have a conjecture, I do test it on the channels listed, and it has saved me a lot of time trying to prove wrong statements.)
Answer
The following is a list of channels you can use to test your conjecture. (Some are special cases of subsequent ones -- it makes more sense to first test the special cases.) Here, d is the dimension of the space.
The identity channel: E(ρ)=ρ .
The fully depolarizing channel: E(ρ)=tr(ρ)1dI .
The depolarizing channel: E(ρ)=γρ+(1−γ)tr(ρ)1dI
for −1d≤γ≤1.The dephasing channel E(ρ)=γρ+(1−γ)ZρZ
for qubits (with Z the Pauli Z matrix), and possibly some suitable generalizations for d>2. If your conjecture is not rotationally symmetric, test rotated versions as well.The "Wirf weg und mach neu™" ("throw away and make new") channel: E(ρ)=tr(ρ)σ
with σ a density matrix. Obviously a generalization of 2, but test e.g. pure states σ.The Holevo-Werner channel: E(ρ)=1d−1(tr(ρ)I−ρT) ,
where ρT is the transposition.Entanglement breaking channels: E(ρ)=∑itr(ρFi)σi
with σi density matrices and the Fi a POVM (i.e., Fi≥0 and ∑Fi=I). Obviously a generalization of 5: These are all channels which can be realized by first measuring the input and then preparing a new output conditioned on the measurement outcome. (You might want to test specific instances of these, like Fi projectors onto subspaces, and σi supported in the same subspace, etc.)
If your conjecture has passed all examples: Congratulations! It is probably true, and you can start proving it!
No comments:
Post a Comment