Wednesday, October 23, 2019

quantum field theory - Irrelevance of parastatistics for space dimension > 2


Consider a system of n undistinguishable particles moving in d-dimensional Euclidean space Ed. The configuration space is M=((Ed)nΔ)/Sn where Δ is the diagonal (subspace where at least 2 particles have coincidental positions) and Sn is the group permuting the particles


Quantization of this system yields superselection sectors corresponding to unitary irreducible representations of π1(M): Sn for d>2, Bn for d=2. The trivial representation yields bosonic statistics, the sign representations yield fermionic statistics. For d>2 there are no other 1-dimensional representations. For d=2 there are other 1-dimensional representations in which switching two particles generates an arbitrary phase. These yield anyonic statistics.


What about higher dimensional irreducible representations? These correspond to parastatistics. It is said that for d>2 we can safely ignore them because in some sense they are equivalent to ordinary bosons/fermions. However for d=2 this is not the case. Why?



Why is parastatistics redundant for d>2 but not for d=2?






No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...