Friday, January 22, 2016

dirac matrices - Are Lifshitz and Berestetskii right in this case?



In the Quantum electrodynamics book (look at the problem) its authors Lifshitz and Berestetskei claim that operator of charge conjugation $\hat {C} = -\alpha_{2}$ in Majorana basis transforms as $\hat {C}^{M} = \alpha_{2}$. Here (they started from the standart (Dirac) representation of the gamma-matrices) $$ \alpha_{2} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \sigma_{y}\\ \sigma_{y} & 0\end{pmatrix}, \quad \beta = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & -1\end{pmatrix}, $$ $$ \hat {C}^{M} = \hat {U}^{+} \hat {C} \hat {U}, \quad \hat {U} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\alpha_{2} + \beta ) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix} 1 & \sigma_{y}\\ \sigma_{y} & -1\end{pmatrix} = \hat {U}^{+}. $$ I tried to get their result, but I only got $$ \hat {C}^{M} = \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 1 & \sigma_{y}\\ \sigma_{y} & -1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & \sigma_{y}\\ \sigma_{y} & 0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 1 & \sigma_{y}\\ \sigma_{y} & -1\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & -1\end{pmatrix}, $$ because $\sigma_{y}^{2} = 1$.


Where is the mistake?


An edit.


I found the mistake. I used the wrong definition of transformation of charge conjugation operator under unitary spinor transformation. The correct one is $\hat {C}^{'} = \hat {U}\hat {C}\hat {U}^{T}$.




No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...