Let's say rigged Hilbert space (S,H,S∗) in Gelfand triple. Where would ket vector live in? Would it be S? That is what I thought, but https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0502053 suggests that it is actually in anti-dual space of S. (Page 3) So is this article right, and I am wrong?
Answer
The paper is correct. Note that in a rigged Hilbert space (S,H,S∗), we have that S⊂H⊂S∗. That is, S (the set of so-called test functions) is a subset of H. The only reason the rigged Hilbert space construction is required in the first place is that ket vectors corresponding to definite states of continuous observables like X and P aren't actually elements of H, which means they're definitely not elements of a subset of H.
I'll be more explicit to address your additional question. Let H be L2(R), which is (roughly) the space of square integrable functions f:R→C. Additionally, let S be the space of rapidly-decaying smooth functions, defined as follows:
S:={f∈C∞(R):∀m,n∈N,supx|xn⋅dmfdxm|<∞}
Essentially, S is the space of all functions to which you can apply the position and momentum operators as many times as you want, with the result still being bounded. It's not difficult to show that S⊂L2(R). It's less clear that S is dense in L2(R), but that also happens to be true.
A linear functional on S is a map φ:S→C such that for all f,g∈S and λ∈C,
- φ(f+g)=φ(f)+φ(g)
- φ(λf)=λφ(f)
An antilinear functional is the same, except ϕ(λf)=ˉλϕ(f) where the bar denotes complex conjugation.
The space of all linear functionals (which we will identify as bras) on S is called the dual space S′, while the set of all antilinear functionals (which we will identify as kets) on S is called the antidual space S∗.
Observe that any element f∈H can be identified with a linear functional φf≡⟨f,∙⟩, which acts on some g∈S as follows: φf(g)=⟨f,g⟩
Momentum Eigenfunctions
Observe that the function eikx, which is not square integrable and thus not an element of H, can be identified with the dual space element φk and the antidual space element ϕk where for all g∈S,
φk(g)=∫∞−∞¯eikxg(x)dx=∫∞−∞e−ikxg(x)dx
You are more used to the bra-ket notation, in which φk≡⟨k| and ϕk≡|k⟩.
Position Eigenfunctions
S′ and S∗ also contain elements that don't correspond to functions at all. The Dirac delta distribution δa is deceptively simple - it just evaluates a function at a. Define the linear functional δa and the antilinear functional δ∗a simply as
δa(g)=g(a)
You are again more familiar with the notation δx≡⟨x| and δ∗x≡|x⟩.
No comments:
Post a Comment