Friday, January 29, 2016

quantum mechanics - Definite Parity of Solutions to a Schrödinger Equation with even Potential?


I am reading up on the Schrödinger equation and I quote:



Because the potential is symmetric under $x\to-x$, we expect that there will be solutions of definite parity.



Could someone kindly explain why this is true? And perhaps also what it means physically?



Answer



Good question! First you need to know that parity refers to the behavior of a physical system, or one of the mathematical functions that describe such a system, under reflection. There are two "kinds" of parity:



  • If $f(x) = f(-x)$, we say the function $f$ has even parity


  • If $f(x) = -f(-x)$, we say the function $f$ has odd parity


Of course, for most functions, neither of those conditions are true, and in that case we would say the function $f$ has indefinite parity.


Now, have a look at the time-independent Schrödinger equation in 1D:


$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}x^2}\psi(x) + V(x)\psi(x) = E\psi(x)$$


and notice what happens when you reflect $x\to -x$:


$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}x^2}\psi(-x) + V(-x)\psi(-x) = E\psi(-x)$$


If you have a symmetric (even) potential, $V(x) = V(-x)$, this is exactly the same as the original equation except that we've transformed $\psi(x) \to \psi(-x)$. Since the two functions $\psi(x)$ and $\psi(-x)$ satisfy the same equation, you should get the same solutions for them, except for an overall multiplicative constant; in other words,


$$\psi(x) = a\psi(-x)$$


Normalizing $\psi$ requires that $|a| = 1$, which leaves two possibilities: $a = +1$ (even parity) and $a = -1$ (odd parity).



As for what this means physically, it tells you that whenever you have a symmetric potential, you should be able to find a basis of eigenstates which have definite even or odd parity (though I haven't proved that here,* only made it seem reasonable). In practice, you get linear combinations of eigenstates with different parities, so the actual state may not actually be symmetric (or antisymmetric) around the origin, but it does at least tell you that if your potential is symmetric, you could construct a symmetric (or antisymmetric) state. That's not guaranteed otherwise. You'd probably have to get input from someone else as to what exactly definite-parity states are used for, though, since that's out of my area of expertise (unless you care about parity of elementary particles, which is rather weirder).




*There is a parity operator $P$ that reverses the orientation of the space: $Pf(x) = f(-x)$. Functions of definite parity are eigenfunctions of this operator. I believe you can demonstrate the existence of a definite-parity eigenbasis by showing that $[H,P] = 0$.


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...