Sunday, September 23, 2018

quantum mechanics - Queries about rotational groups mathrmSO(3) and mathrmSU(2) in QM


In a QM text I am using (Sakurai 2nd edition 'Modern Quantum Mechanics'), he describes two rotation groups, namely the SO(3) rotation group and SU(2) rotation group (unitary unimodular group).



He defines SO(3) as a group with matrix multiplication on a set of orthogonal matrices (which are matrices which satisfy RTR=1=RRT), he then states that this group only includes rotational operators (and not also inverse operators which would be the group O(3)). He does not ever rigorously define 'rotational operation'.



  1. How you would distinguish between rotational operators and inverse operators, would a sufficient definition be that rotational operators is a transformation with one fixed point?


He also defines the the group SU(2) which consists of unitary unimodular matrices, and states that the most general unitary matrix in two dimensions has four independent parameters and it is defined as U=eiγ(abba)

where |a|2+|b|2=1,   γ=γ.



  1. Am I right to assume that the SO(3) rotation group does not have much of application in quantum mechanics but is rather used more in classical mechanics whereas SU(2) is used more in quantum mechanics, particularly for s=12 spin systems where we work in a two dimensional Hilbert space?

  2. How does it follow that there are four independent parameters for the general unitary matrix, the way I see it there are three independent parameters, namely, a, b and γ?




No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...