Friday, November 29, 2019

wick theorem - Klein factors and Conformal Field Theory


Consider the mode expansion of a (chiral) scalar field confined to a disc with circumference L: ϕ(x)=ϕ0+pϕ2πLx+n=11ne(kna)/2(eiknx bn+eiknx bn)

with kn=2πnL , ϕ0 some "zero-mode", pϕ some "conjugate momentum" and a some short-distance cut-off. The operators fulfill the following bosonic commutation relations [bn,bn]=δn,nand[ϕ0,pϕ]=i


(Fermionic) Vertex operators are defined by Vα(x)=:eiαϕ(x):

with : ... : denoting normal ordering. Inserting the mode expansion of ϕ(x) into the definition of the vertex operator yields to lowest order in aL:


:eiαϕ(x):=(L2πa)Δ(α)eiαϕ(x)

with the "scaling dimension" Δ(α)=α22. The pre factor on right side in front of the exponential is sometimes called "Klein factor".


Now here are my questions (They may really be "Newbie"-CFT-questions;) ) :





  1. Since the right hand side is only an approximation of of :eiαϕ(x): to lowest order I am wondering whether the left hand-side reproduces the correct (say) fermonic commutators in all cases and whether hand side only partially reproduces the correct fermonic commutators?




  2. If the right-handside only indeed only partially reproduces the correct commutation relations how can we say that a certain product of fermionic operators (say a product of 3 fermionic operators) indeed obeys the correct sermonic commutators when written in the "bosonized language"?




  3. What is the importance of the higher-order terms in aL in the "expansion" of the vertex operator?





  4. Is all this a more general construction in CFT?




I am looking forward to your responses!




No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...