Monday, June 3, 2019

quantum field theory - Help understanding loops with negative superficial degree of divergence


Consider


d4k(2π)41k21k21k2.


We can Wick rotate k0ik0:


id4kE(2π)41k2E1k2E1k2E and switch to spherical coordinates


=2π2idkE(2π)4k3Ek6E =2π2idkE(2π)41k3E


which doesn't converge according to Mathematica. I'm basically confused because dk1kn doesn't converge for any n using Mathematica.


I may be missing an obvious point. Why isn't this finite?


Does it change significantly if the denominator involves a mass?



Answer




The integral is infra-red divergent. Power counting is about ultra-violet divergences. As you can check for yourself, the singular behaviour is in the lower limit: ϵ1xndx=(1n)1x1n|ϵϵ1n which blows up if n>1.


The superficial degree of divergence tells you that the integral is superficially convergent as far as the k integration region is concerned. It tells nothing about possible singularities at finite values of k. In other words, the degree of divergence is all about the UV, but it knows nothing about the IR. In this example, the singularity is of the second type.


To regulate this integral you have to introduce a non-zero mass in the propagators, or use the dimensional regularisation trick xndx0n which is known as Veltman's formula. It can be argued that this formula is consistent as far as perturbation theory is concerned. Pragmatically speaking, this can be accomplished by introducing a non-zero mass and taking the massless limit carefully. In more formal terms, the consistency of the prescription can be proven by means of analytical continuation to complex n (cf. 1.1666512).


For more details, see Massless integrals in dim-reg and Divergence of the tree level scattering amplitude in quantum field theory. The latter contains a list of useful references on IR divergences, their physical meaning and regularisation techniques.


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...