I am reading from Schwarz book on QFT the Path Integral chapter and I am confused about something. I attached a SS of that part. So we have <Φj+1|e−iδH(tj)|Φj>=Nexp(iδt∫d3xL[Φj,∂tΦj]).
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
quantum field theory - Clarification of Path Integral formulation
What happens when we have the left and right most terms i.e. <Φ1|e−iδH(t0)|0>
and <0|e−iδH(tn)|Φn> ?
Another thing that I am confused about, where are we using the fact that the state in the beginning and the end is |0>? I see we are using the boundaries on time, but I can't see where we use explicitly the fact that we start and end with vacuum i.e. if we had any $
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?
I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...
-
Are C1, C2 and C3 connected in parallel, or C2, C3 in parallel and C1 in series with C23? Btw it appeared as a question in the basic physics...
-
I have read the radiation chapter, where I have been introduced with the terms emissivity and absorptivity. emissivity tells about the abili...
-
I was solving the sample problems for my school's IQ society and there are some I don't get. Since all I get is a final score, I wan...
No comments:
Post a Comment