I need to elaborate the equation ,and need to know what is the physical significance and how matrices will manipulate in the equation ˆH=(^τ3+i^τ2)ˆp22m0+^τ3m0c2=|11−1−1|ˆp22m0+|100−1|m0c2
Where τ1,τ2,τ3
Answer
Your second equation is somehow mistyped: it should have only one p22m factor in the first term.
Also, the notation m0 devoid of physical meaning. There is not "rest mass" (different from any other "mass") - what used to be called by some authors (e.g. early in the 20th century) the "rest mass" is now understood to be the only mass that make sense to assign to a (massive) particle. Therefore the only correct notation is m, not m0.
I am not sure what is your question. Perhaps showing that that Hamiltonian is somehow equivalent to the Klein-Gordon's Hamiltonian? Or something else? If that is what you are asking, then the derivation is straight-forward. Let's have a slightly more general starting expression: H=ap22m+bmc2, where a and b are 2×2 matrices whose properties are to be determined. Square H to get: H2=a2(p22m)2+{a,b}p22mmc2+b2m2c4. If we can find a and b such to have a2=0 {a,b}=2⋅1 (here {A,B}:≡AB+BA) and b2=1 (and 1 is the unit matrix), then we would get the original dispersion equation for a free relativistic particle: H2=p2c2+m2c4. One such a choice is a=τ3+iτ2 and b=τ3, but there are many other choices, too.
Working with the components:
H(χξ)=[(p22m+mc2)(100−1)+p22m(01−10)](χξ)
gives:
Hχ=(p22m+mc2)χ+p22mξ
and
Hξ=−(p22m+mc2)ξ−p22mχ
Notice that [H,p2]=0 so one can apply H one more time to the left side of any of these two equations:
H2χ=(p22m+mc2)Hχ+p22mHξ=(p22m+mc2)2χ+(p22m+mc2)p22mξ−p22m(p22m+mc2)ξ−(p22m)2χ=[(p22m+mc2)2−(p22m)2]χ=[p2c2+m2c4]χ.
Etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment