I've been having a little trouble proving that [Page 138 of "Introduction to Topological Quantum Computation" by Jiannis K. Pachos]:
SCS=k4π∫Md3xϵμνρtr(Aμ∂νAρ+i23AμAνAρ)
(with Aμ=AaμTa and Ta a generator of the gauge group's Lie alegebra) can be written as:
SCS=k8π∫Md3xϵμνρ(Aaμ∂νAaρ−13fabcAaμAbνAcρ)
wherefabc is antisymmetric.
My attempt thus far:
tr(Aμ∂νAρ+i23AμAνAρ)
=tr(AaμTa∂νAbρTb+i23AaμTaAbνTbAcρTc)
=tr(Aaμ∂νAbρ(TaTb)+i23AaμAbνAcρ(TaTbTc))
Using tr(TaTb)=12δab and (TaTbTc)=12[Ta,Tb]Tc+12{Ta,Tb}Tc we get:
=(12Aaμ∂νAaρ+i13AaμAbνAcρtr([Ta,Tb]Tc+{Ta,Tb}Tc))
Using
[Ta,Tb]=ifabdTd
and {Ta,Tb}=1Nδab+dabdTd, where dabc is symmetric, we get:
=(12Aaμ∂νAaρ+i13AaμAbνAcρtr(ifabdTdTc+1NδabTc+dabdTdTc))
Using tr(TA)=0 and tr(TaTb)=12δab, we get:
=(12Aaμ∂νAaρ+i13AaμAbνAcρ12(ifabc+dabc))
Now this would be precisely what we need if the dabc disappeared somehow but I'm not sure how to make that happen. If AaμAbνAcρ were anti-symmetric under permutation of the indices (abc) then if would cancel with the symmetric dabc but as far as I'm aware the Aaμ's don't behave that way.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers in advance.
Answer
I think is quite simple if you split the product of two Aμ's in symmetric and anti-symmetric terms as AμAν=12[Aμ,Aν]+12{Aμ,Aν}.
No comments:
Post a Comment