So my physics class has just finished a long unit on optics while at the same time I've been trying to teach myself relativity. I admit my understanding is probably rudimentary, but I figured all the more reason to ask for help on this.
So I'll start off my question just with what I know of relativity, just to see if maybe my issue is in my understanding of it. I was told that the rest mass of light is 0 based on the equation $E=pc$ adequately representing the energy of light instead of the original equation, $$E^2 ={ (m_0 c^2)^2 + (pc)^2 } \,\!.$$ Now because $E=pc$, we can then say, based on $p=mv$, that $E=(mv)c$. changing relativistic mass out for invariant mass, we can say $$E = \frac{m_0 v c}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}.$$ Now when we plug a photon with velocity $c$ into this equation, we get that $\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{(c)^2}{c^2}}}=\frac{1}{0}$, and that along with the rest of the equation gives us $E=\frac{(0)(c)c}{(0)}$. We then of course say $\frac{0}{0}=undefined$, which from my basic understanding of other people showing this to me, means that E is a value, it's just that this specific equation where we use the lorentz factor and rest mass is incapable of defining what the value is, thus we rely on other equations such as $E=hf$. Please feel free to correct me if that is all wrong, it's just what I've been told thus far.
Now then, I'm going to put a bookmark in that thought above so I can talk about optics. In optics, one of the first things we learned is that the wavelength of light changes in a medium based on $c=fλ$, where $f$ is being used for frequency, because $c$ changes in a medium, as mapped by $n=\frac{c}{v}$, where $v$ is, in that equation, the speed of light in a medium, and $c$ is now defined as the constant speed of light in a vacuum.
So based on the final equation given in my paragraph on relativity, if the speed of light $v$ (again, $v$ meaning speed of light in a medium) changes in a medium, we get this equation: $E = \frac{m_0 v c}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ where $v < c$ in a medium that is not a vacuum, meaning our lorentz factor does not equal 0 anymore. However, $E > 0$ still, and therefore it would seem that rest mass can no longer equal 0 since it is being multiplied by two real numbers, and any real number multiplied by 0 should be 0.
Finally, on to my actual question. The issue shown in the paragraph above has already been addressed numerous times it would seem, stating that particles in the medium might absorb the photons energy and then emit them back out. The issue I'm having understanding is that this answer does not seem to show how the wavelength of light could still change in the medium. if $c$ is actually constant in that medium and only appears to change because it is being delayed by absorption, then the wavelength of light should not change because of the prior equation, $c=fλ$. This problem would seem to come up in any answer that states that the speed of light is only appearing to change, and therefore it seems to me that either the idea that the wavelength of light changes in a medium or something in relativity is inadequate.
Does anyone have any explanation for how to reconcile this issue, or perhaps have an answer to the original problem of the speed of light changing in a medium that circumvents it? Or is the problem that just my math or understanding is incorrect and needs to be tweaked?
No comments:
Post a Comment