Tuesday, October 17, 2017

general relativity - Explicit Variation of Gibbons-Hawking-York Boundary Term


Are there any references that present the explicit variation of the Hilbert-Einstein action plus the Hawking-Gibbons-York boundary term, and demonstrate the cancellation of the normal derivatives of metric variations? I have tried to read the original papers by York and Gibbons&Hawking, but they are not that pedagogical to me.



Answer



I've never seen a paper where the calculation is performed in a manifestly covariant manner. However, I've posted a set of reference notes on my website (http://jacobi.luc.edu/notes.html) that contains the variations needed to carry out the calculation. Let me summarize the calculation here.


The action for gravity on a compact region M with boundary M is IEH+IGHY=12κ2Mdd+1xgR+1κ2MddxhK .

The metric on M is gμν, and R=gμνRμν is the Ricci Scalar. The induced metric on the boundary M is hμν=gμνnμnν, where nμ is the (spacelike) unit vector normal to MM. Now consider a small variation in the metric: gμνgμν+δgμν. The quantities appearing in the Einstein-Hilbert part of the action change in the following manner: δg=12ggμνδgμν
δR=Rμνδgμν+μ(νδgμνgνλμδgνλ)
Thus, the change in IEH is δIEH=12κ2Mdd+1xg(12gμνRRμν)δgμν+1κ2Mddxh12nμ(νδgμνgνλμδgνλ) ,
with the boundary term coming from the volume integral of the total derivative in δR. The variations of the quantities in the GHY term are a bit more complicated to work out, but they all basically follow from standard definitions and this result for the variation of the normal vector: δnμ=12nμnνnλδgνλ=12δgμνnν+cμ .
In the second equality I've introduced a vector cμ that is orthogonal to nμ; it is given by cμ=12hμλδgνλnν .
The reason I've introduced this vector is that the variation in the trace of the extrinsic curvature can be written as δK=12Kμνδgμν12nμ(νδgμνgνλμδgνλ)+Dμcμ
where Dμ is the covariant derivative along M that is compatible with the induced metric hμν. So, the change in the GHY part of the action is δIGHY=1κ2Mddxh(12hμνδgμνK+δK) .
Combining this with δIEH we see that the several terms cancel, leaving δI=12κ2Mdd+1xg(12gμνRRμν)δgμν+1κ2Mddxh(12(hμνKKμν)δgμν+Dμcμ) .
We discard the term Dμcμ, which is a total boundary derivative.


No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...