Tuesday, July 24, 2018

quantum field theory - What is the origin of the factor of 1/4 in the Maxwell Lagrangian?


I have seen numerous 'derivations' of the Maxwell Lagrangian,


L = 14FμνFμν,


but every one has sneakily inserted a factor of 1/4 without explaining why. The Euler-Lagrange equations are the same no matter what constant we put in front of the contraction of the field strength tensors, so why the factor of 1/4?



Answer



Comments to the question:




  1. First it should be stressed, as OP does, that the Euler-Lagrange equations (= classical equations of motion = Maxwell's equations) are unaffected by scaling the action S[A] with an overall (non-zero) constant. So classically, one may choose any overall normalization that one would like.





  2. As Frederic Brünner mentions a normalization of the JμAμ source term with a normalization constant ±N goes hand in hand with a N4 normalization of the FμνFμν term. Here the signature of the Minkowski metric is (,±,±,±).




  3. Recall that the fundamental variables of the Lagrangian formulation are the 4-gauge potential Aμ. Here A0 is a non-dynamical Lagrange multiplier. The dynamical variables of the theory are A1, A2, and A3. The 14FμνFμν = 123i=1˙Ai˙Aikinetic term+

    is just the standard +12 normalization of a kinetic term in field theory. In particular note that the kinetic term is positive definite in order not to break unitarity.




No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...