Friday, December 20, 2019

particle physics - Evidence that nuclei contain neutrons and protons (other than nucleons appearing if a nucleus is smashed)?


This may seem like a silly question, but I believe this to be very fundamental because the Standard Model of particle physics seems based on the axiom or assumption that neutrons and protons exist “as-is” inside atomic nuclei.


Why else would the standard model require a strong nuclear force to hold everything together?



Surely there must be more evidence that this is the case besides the fact that neutrons and protons appear when a nucleus is smashed ?


EDIT: It has been a long time since I asked this question, and looking at it now (dec 5 2017) it seems like I have not mentioned an important reason for asking this question. In any case, this is what I want to add to the question now:


Take for example the Helium nucleus which is postulated to consist four separate baryons that need to be kept together with the strong force in the standard model. I would expect that in that case the total mass of a Helium nucleus would be at least that of the 4 individual baryons added together, and then I would expect to have to add more mass because of binding energy of the strong force.


Instead, the mass of the Helium nucleus is less than the four individual baryons combined. Isn’t that evidence that the Helium nucleus cannot consist of four separate “as-is” baryons?


And if that is the case, what is the evidence that these, what I would call “reduced”, baryons still require a strong force to be kept together? I mean, these baryons have lost some mass in the process of fusing together in a Helium nucleus which means they have changed somehow. Then I wonder, what if this change also changes the repulsive forces between them into attractive forces for example while retaining all the other particle specific characteristics? Would that not be a more elegant explanation than a strong nuclear force?


I mean, it would not change a thing in the released energy levels when fusing two protons and two neutrons together. The only thing that changes is the model. A model that seems just as compatible with the data as the model with a strong nuclear force.




No comments:

Post a Comment

classical mechanics - Moment of a force about a given axis (Torque) - Scalar or vectorial?

I am studying Statics and saw that: The moment of a force about a given axis (or Torque) is defined by the equation: $M_X = (\vec r \times \...