It is said, that when measured, a quantum system undergoes "wave function collapse", which is a non-unitary transformation.
Why?
The wave function is
Ψ=α|0⟩+β|1⟩
where
|α|2+|β|2=1
The probabilities sum after measurement is still 1
, for example, if system collapsed to |0⟩, then
|1|2+|0|2=1
For example, if function was
Ψ=1√2|0⟩+1√2|1⟩
the transformation was
[1√21√200]
Isn't this transformation unitary?
Answer
No.
As long as your state is |Ψ⟩=α|0⟩+β|1⟩, then as you said α and β need to satisfy |α|2+|β|2=1, so say α=β=1/√2.
If you perform a measurement and find that the system in the |0⟩ state, then the new wavefunction will be Ψ=|0⟩. You can write it as Ψ=α|0⟩ but because of normalisiation |α|2 needs to be 1, so α must be either 1 or a pure phase factor.
You had to change the normalisation by hand (changing α from 1/√2 to 1). A unitary transformation on |Ψ⟩ would affect only the kets and not the constants. The time evolution of any wavefunction is governed by the Schrodinger equation which, when solved, is effectively a unitary transformation -- unitary transformations leave the norm unchanged. The time evolution due to performing measurements, however, is something entirely different and does not follow the formalism of the Schrodinger equation.
A unitary transformation leaves the norm unchanged, since the norm of U|Ψ⟩ is ⟨Ψ|U†U|Ψ⟩=⟨Ψ|Ψ⟩ if U is unitary. In your specific case this is true, but only because you had to manually change the normalisation of the post-measurement wavefunction. If QM included measurement, then there should be a deterministic way of computing how α or β would change. But it doesn't, so you need to re-normalise it.
No comments:
Post a Comment